Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem.

In these days, there are a variety of critical issues which people encounter and should deal with them. Indeed, Finding the best answer to these problems plays a prominent role in everyone individuals succeed. There is no shortage of debate about what is the best approach to find a great solution. Some people agree that creativity is the most vital factor for finding an excellent one; however, others take the opposite view and give prominence to planning. As far as I concern, planning carefully for finding the best answer is monumental than being creative. in what follows two elaborate reasons will vindicate my standpoint.

The first vital point to bear in mind is that problems can be simplified by splitting it into several practical steps while it needs strict planning, yet no creativity. To clarify, any kinds of issues, regardless of having any degree of complexity, have many details which we should consider and try to solve the main issue according to them. If we plan and divide the problem into several steps, we could solve them steps by steps, which is much easier than solving the whole issue all at once. Besides, because we allocated our time and consideration into several angles of the problem, the final solution will be more accurate than an answer which maybe we could immediately find just with creativity. This approach is much risky because we might overlook the problem, and we are more susceptible to mistake. For instance, in the last winter, my family and I decided to go on a trip. We planned everything step by step, the food we wanted to eat on travel, the car condition, fuel, the hotel we wanted to go when we arrived, and so on. Also, we considered an alternative plan for each item if something went wrong. So when we were out of the gasoline in the middle of a cold night in one remote place not only did we not had any difficulty because we used the extra tank we had but also by the blanket we brought for such emergency the coldness was not a significant problem when our car had turned off. All of this was the result of proper planning and considering any potential problems which no need creativity at all.

The second noteworthy reason is that by planning, we can look at problems as opportunities to improve the system and the relationships, especially in a work environment. Problem-solving is a critical element in our lives, and work so by planning; we can manage all the process of that. For instance, in a work environment, our function affects the function of the whole system. So when we face one problem in work, the best approach is fixing that with collective planning and cooperation of our colleagues. To clarify, after detecting the challenges we should share the main issue and the information we have with others who are involved in such as our boss and our colleagues then with their help we can find the best solution and plan to fix that together. There are actions which we can take to feel more in control. Besides, the more we cooperate in such teamwork, the more we can establish a rapport with others. Had we just wanted to answer the problem immediately at the beginning of the process, it would have may cause conflict with the others because it may have a destructive effect on their function.

All in all, I strongly contend that strict planning facilitates finding the best answer to problems which we encounter rather than creativity. Because people are born problem solvers, the biggest challenge is to overcome the tendency to immediately come up with a solution. The most common mistake in problem-solving is trying to find an answer right away. That's a mistake because it tries to put the solution at the beginning of the process when what we need is a solution at the end of the process. It illustrates the importance of planning for solving problems. So, in my opinion, the assumption that by being just creative, we can find the best solution is entirely an illusion.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-04 siri25 73 view
2019-06-14 pegahamiri 73 view
2019-06-14 pegahamiri 73 view
2018-09-13 emadifahimeh@gmail.com 70 view
2018-09-13 emadifahimeh@gmail.com 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user pegahamiri :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 564, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...swer is monumental than being creative. in what follows two elaborate reasons will...
^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...is trying to find an answer right away. Thats a mistake because it tries to put the s...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3277.0 1977.66487455 166% => OK
No of words: 690.0 407.700716846 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74927536232 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.12521717326 4.48103885553 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7032777447 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 308.0 212.727598566 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446376811594 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1025.1 618.680645161 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5018275908 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.233333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196570862101 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638474725374 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557555063318 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155280409451 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569930949212 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.