Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Company should pay for employees to get university degree.
Some companies choose several ways to improve the quality of employees. While some consume the budget on getting a university degree for workers, others decide to other staff. It is so controvertible for them to determine a specific solution. In my view, the money should be used as that employees can acquire a university degree. They can work for the company more productive, improve how they think of the company, and teach others about the method they learn in a university.
To begin with, the company exploits fees as the improvement of productivity to recommend coworkers to go to a university. Students have to complete each task such as homework, presentation, hanging out with friends in school life. It is so similar to the jobs which employees have to finish in companies. Therefore, they would improve the skills of how they manage the time to spend each task as equal as possible if they obtain the opportunity to attain a university degree.
Secondly, employees would develop the thinking skills to attend university classes for a degree. In school, there are a fair amount of groups works that they have to utilize the brain as much as possible. As a result, they would create advanced logical thinking. Moreover, it would be worthwhile if they put on the executive position in the team where they have to cooperate with others. For example, employees sometimes face a bunch of problems to achieve the confidence of their boss. General people build up the same ideas as others. However, once they have the chance to get a university degree, their mindset would be fresher and wisely to consider the projects. Hence, they would succeed in the company.
Finally, studying at university gives workers a different method to teach others about it. People often provide a lesson about what they learned in the past their fellows. Take myself as an example, one of my colleagues went to get a master's degree in business in the United States by the money the company gave him. From this experience, he progressed the strategy of how we ran an organization in this harsh environment. Thus, my team dramatically changed the attitude and thinking about each work, and the company recorded the highest production sell in the country.
To sum up, the company should spend money on providing employees to get a university degree. I completely believe that there are a lot of advantages such as getting developed productivity, highly logical thinking, and sophisticated teaching ability.
- One company plans to prohibit employees from working through emails and text messages during weekends and holidays Some people believe that by doing this the company can reduce employees dissatisfaction with the company while others believe this does not 87
- Which of the following is the most beneficial for young people during their spare time 1 gaining practical work experience through part time job or volunteering in the community 2 learning to play a sport 3 learning to play a musical instrument 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 52
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parent should limit the hours that children spend on digital products besides schoolwork 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rapid growth of cities has a positive impact on the development of the society 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...r a degree. In school, there are a fair amount of groups works that they have to utili...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01201923077 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78246100887 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9214523651 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.875 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199955581459 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591284558504 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589426115671 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125228608681 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480557323417 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.