Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From the begining of the humankind, always there have been some conflicts between people. Hence, humankind established governments, and the crusial problems in the country would be settled by the government. One of the materials are still in struggle is whether the government should valued arts more than sports, or inconversly. While the artists believe that art involve the emotion of the nation and should be valued more, the athleters hold colliding viewpoints. I firmly believe that sprot should be in priority for the governments, especially in funding issues. There are some advantages to this view, and in this essay, I will elaborate on two of my most important reasons.
The first and most important reason is that the nation's joy and happiness are more related to the sports rather than arts. The dimension of formal competiton confirm this view. For example, the Olympic competition that occure every four years between all the countries in the world, in all fields of sports, engross a lot of people. The people of diffrent nation favor their national teams. They would be happy if a athlets reach to a gold medal. Some people's emotions are very related to this competiton. For instanse, I saw some people surround me who cry for these plays.
The second noteworthy point I want to mention that is athletics team need more financial support than art. With the inensifies of Olympic and relevant popular competiton, the sponsorers more invest in their teams. So the level of these competiton enhanced nowadays. If one countriy's teams want to be thrived, the government should endorese them in the all aspects. If the teams have some funding problems, they would fall behind in the competitions. For example, my country's nation teams always suffer from funding issues. Thus they reach to success occaisionally.
In sum, I firmly believe that governments should especially attend to sports teams. Some reasons lead me to this viewpoint, chief amongst them is the people walefare upon on the nation teams' successful. Aside from this reason, the athletics teams require a lot of money to thrive in the new era's compet
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...t and most important reason is that the nations joy and happiness are more related to t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... national teams. They would be happy if a athlets reach to a gold medal. Some peo...
^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eams always suffer from funding issues. Thus they reach to success occaisionally. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'sport'.
Suggestion: sport
...governments should especially attend to sports teams. Some reasons lead me to this vie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, still, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63908069237 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8992637624 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5652173913 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3043478261 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65217391304 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175110898549 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476952656111 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593830017345 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112841280043 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544398143146 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.