Universities are the places where students have their education for their lives and more importantly for the development of their country. In my view, universities should not spend money on salaries of professors but they should spend money on the classes, laboratories, libraries and so on. This essay is aimed to explain the reasons of this notion.
Initially, if the opportunities of a university is not well, then there is no point to give a rise on a salary of a professor. Because, without required tools or programmes, no professor can give the education they were planning to. Hence, professors' performance can not be seen well on the students. Controversially, these students became non-qualified individuals in future because they did not have the chance to get the education they should have got. This situation can cause problems in future because these students will not be able to do their jobs efficiently and their moral will be down. Thus, this leads not only a physhcologigcal break down but also a loss of time and money of the company they worked in.
Secondly, professors are the people who are eagerly want to teach and learn. Of course they have to get the salary they deserve however, I assumed that money is not their priority. Having more money can not give the pleasure of seeing their students in well places. Providing the opportunities they required is way more important than a fat check.
Lastly, if a university spend more money to professors that university needs, there would be a chaos. Actually, chaos would be inevitable. Since the students have only limited time to learn in a collage, they would be furious if they do not get the education they need. Additionally, that could be resulted in protests which could definitely harm the reputation of the university. From my point of view, harmed reputation is the worst thing for a university because it causes a decrease in student number -no student would want to chose a bad imaged university - and that leads a decrease in universities' trading capital. Therefore, the future of the university will not be bright.
In a nutshell, spending money for the education and the future of the students is way more significant that spending on a professor.
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mam-mal known as Repenomomus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers have therefore suggested 78
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some people trust their first impression about a person s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct Other people don t judge a person s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong 80
- Neighbours are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbour? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'wanted'.
Suggestion: wanted
...ofessors are the people who are eagerly want to teach and learn. Of course they have...
^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant that spending on a professor.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, of course, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96816976127 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8967045951 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458885941645 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2032521428 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.65 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149314483691 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538325162113 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657608379994 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1013475721 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533990117005 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.