Some people trust their first impression about a person s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct Other people don t judge a person s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong

There are common mistakes that can be done without our self control and judging people at first sight is one of these mistakes. In my view, everyone has a different and valuable character and no one can show theirselves in the same way. For this reason, I believe that judging from first impression is wrong.

First of all, the moment we met people is one of the most determining thing for our first impression. Because, at that very moment, that person might be sad, sick, hopeless, busy, excited, hungry and so on. All these parameters and more are plays a very significant role in their behavior. A person who seems friendly at the beginning can be a very two-faced person. Or someone who seems cold and snob may have trust issues in his/her past and that makes this person to take slow steps. Every single person have their own reason to act in a different way to show their real self. Therefore, without getting to know someone well, we should not judge people. For example, I met my best friend at collage and at the beginning I really disliked her because of my prejudgements. After a couple of weeks, I started to get to know her better and I saw that we have so much in common. Now, I am really glad that I took a chance to talk to her and grateful that she is still in my life and making my life tolerable.

Secondly, sometimes we hear about people and we create an idea about these people without giving any chance to express himself/herself. These gossips are one of the biggest obstacle for meeting someone for the first time. Because, we assume that the person we heard about before is good or bad. Hence, our relationship with these people built up in an unhealthy way.

Another thing that about this subject is the way we act at first meetings. Maybe we look so unfriendly, bored, tired or very cheerful at first and that also could affect the actings of the other persons. Furthermore, in time the way we act changes and others may started to think that we changed a lot however, we were always the same. Unfortunately, only thing that changes is the amount of the information they collected.

As a conclusion, many people - including me- judges others without any consideration. But, this is the biggest mistake that we make to ourselves because, we miss a chance to know someone accurately.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...gle person have their own reason to act in a different way to show their real self. Therefore, wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unhealthy way" with adverb for "unhealthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...relationship with these people built up in an unhealthy way. Another thing that about this subj...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, another thing, for example, first of all, in my view, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60628019324 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55560771407 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519323671498 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5431163046 48.9658058833 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.9130434783 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04347826087 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200783596269 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613893839985 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048802531349 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114866556672 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497665889184 0.0645574589148 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.