Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that education has revolutionized the world with many advancements and technological breakthroughs. In this regard, the role of educators is of paramount importance. There is no shortage of debate on whether the government should raise the educator's salaries or not. Some people see an eye to eye with it, others take an issue with it. IF I were asked, I would agree to the notion that it is of utmost importance to increase the salaries of university professors. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my stance is associated with the notion that raise in salary will motivate the professors to devote their efforts to educating the students which will result in the development of an educative society.To be more specific, when teachers are provided with high salaries, they will stay loyal to their job and try to instill their knowledge into the students. It is also obvious that by doing so teachers will build the foundation of a successful society. Due to the reason that students are the future of the country. If they are educated, the country will flourish.On the other hand, if teachers are not given any raise or incentive, they might not feel any encouragement and will continue to teach the students with low morale that is devastating for students' future. By the way of illustration, in my country Pakistan, university professors are given high value and their efforts are appreciated by giving them bonuses and increments. As a result, my country is showing great progress at the international level. Thousands of students as doctors and engineers and other educative experts are embarking their life toward success.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that if teachers' salaries are enhanced it will attract the multitalented people to teaching profession. Quality of education will be improved. To be more specific, because educator salaries are not higher, usually professors are the one who couldn't got job in multinational highly paid corporates. Thus. those sectors take the cream of the professionals.If professors salaries are raised too, more people will attract to teaching profession and, hence will provide the valuable and profitable knowledge to children. As a case in mind to shed some light. Five years ago, when my brother applied for a Bioengineering professor position in India. though he was goldmedalist and was a capable candidate, he was not offered a good salary.He was reluctant to accept the offer. Fortunately, a private corporate offered him the salary almost double of what the university has offered. Obviously, he had chosen the Private company. If university had offered him the high salary, he would have instilled his knowledge to the university pupils.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that spending more on university professors salaried brings a plethora of advantages, For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, an increment in salaries motivates the teachers to work hard. Second, raising the salaries will improve the quality of education to students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...the development of an educative society.To be more specific, when teachers are pro...
^^
Line 2, column 606, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...are educated, the country will flourish.On the other hand, if teachers are not giv...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...her, usually professors are the one who couldnt got job in multinational highly paid co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...n multinational highly paid corporates. Thus. those sectors take the cream of the pr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
...inational highly paid corporates. Thus. those sectors take the cream of the professio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...ors take the cream of the professionals.If professors salaries are raised too, mor...
^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e and profitable knowledge to children. As a case in mind to shed some light. Five...
^^
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Though
...ngineering professor position in India. though he was goldmedalist and was a capable c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...idate, he was not offered a good salary.He was reluctant to accept the offer. Fort...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, second, so, still, thus, as a result, by and large, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2695.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19267822736 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99163089276 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518304431599 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 863.1 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3628445232 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.653846154 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9615384615 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231895776776 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628086098757 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474979887312 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158261381519 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399933990462 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.