Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs.
Artificial intelligence is the future. The quote from Steve Jobs will soon be seen in effect, no one really thought that. Personally, I believe that the current rate at which each sector making itself automated is really going to affect badly to the people and their jobs. I feel this way for few reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, automation is claimed to make a particular process quicker and efficient. It is claimed to make people's lives easier, but they do not account the fact about it affecting the overall lives of the people in a whole. What about the jobs that people will be losing because of it. For instance, take the movie industry for example where one wouldn't have thought to be affected by automation. Still, it did by taking the jobs of the helicopter's pilot and the cameraman that shoots an aerial shot for a scene. It was drastically replaced by drones where both their roles were made redundant. Similarly, in the case artists, painters and designer, their jobs was replaced by these softwares and robots which could do their jobs in few seconds is much accurate and rapid. But what about the few considerations required by where human factors come into play, these software and robots can be made perfect but will never be able to give to drawings a human's touch.
Secondly, businessmen and entrepreneurs do not like to consider the effect this automation could have on the employees of their companies. Their main concern is about the growth of the company and how could they become better than their competitors. My personal experience is with the recent riots of the workers of a company in our city. These workers who worked for years in the company suddenly were given their final paycheck and were suggested to find other jobs as the company did't requried them anymore. Since they had planted new machines which were fully automated, that just put the dead end to the jobs of hundreds of workers in a day. People do not realise that few people that are enjoying the boon of this new innovative automated technology there are several others who are moaning over the way it is affetcting their lives and their famalies. The world here is neglecting the main point that in order to grow as a nation, companies should increase the new roles and positions for the people to work. As this would ultimately add more to the growth through taxes and spending of those employees on goods. If the people are without jobs they will restrain themselves from spending which will ultimately hinder the nation's development.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that one way or another automation will affect the jobs of several people as compared to the number of people it will actually benefit. This is because it will just put a higher rate of people into unemployment or in some sectors all the employees are jobless and this is in no way going to help any nation or humanity in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | sanket_chaudhary | 88 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 63 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | cluelessme | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Mmddzz3 | 73 | view |
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 79
- Thankfully with the passage of time we ve seen more and more campaigns to reduce the usage of wood products in our everyday life They represent one of the main contributors to global climate change so it s an absolute must that we have to remove them from 60
- We have heard many people talking in recent times about the potential for exploiting the ocean floor for resources and the future of aquamarine agriculture and write y This just demonstrates that after we have finished with the destruction on land we will 68
- Nuclear power plants are really devastating for the nature The nuclear waste that is created as a result of fission stays radioactive for thousands of years Also we had several nuclear disasters that have proven how unstable this whole system is There are 83
- We are witnessing a very large hype regarding the colonization of Mars But we should actually colonize Saturns moon Titan if we are willing to start the colonization of our solar system Setting up a colony on Titan would be much easier and there we would 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...he movie industry for example where one wouldnt have thought to be affected by automati...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 864, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this software' or 'these softwares'?
Suggestion: this software; these softwares
... by where human factors come into play, these software and robots can be made perfect but will...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...ople that are enjoying the boon of this new innovative automated technology there are several ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d spending of those employees on goods. If the people are without jobs they will r...
^^
Line 3, column 1229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ending which will ultimately hinder the nations development. In conclusion, I am of t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70873786408 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49143995915 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.123816219 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.434782609 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3913043478 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286559876318 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799012816189 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611554291238 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173312279162 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221372185798 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.