Do you agree or disagree with following statement
The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs.
Technology has always been evolving. People in the 1950s won't have believed that we would be able to talk to a person on screen and feel just like they are actually in front of us. I agree with the prompt that an increase in automation will lead to people lose their jobs and to warrant the same I have two reasons.
Firstly, technology won't stop evolving. Being human beings we will always try and find solutions to our problems that could make our daily life easier and easier. For instance, consider the invention of barcodes, if barcodes weren't invented many people would still have jobs at local grocery stores. As there comes enhancement in technology some sector of people is going to lose their jobs. If they still want to pursue the same field they might need to upskill themselves or else choose a completely different field to work in. This can be thought of as disheartening, but the positive side is that we are making progress every day. As the newer inventions are made the job of many people are going to be obsolete and they'll have to learn something new.
Secondly, as we stay in the digital world we are about to experience more and more automation in our daily life. For example, now we have personalized robots to clean houses that are based on artificial intelligence. This does hamper the jobs of cleaning staff as they'll be replaced by a machine and in return, they would be losing their jobs. As matter of fact, no field in the world has seen an evolution in which people aren't losing jobs. So the generations ahead there would be a lot of people losing jobs just because their job was done by some robot or a computer. There are plenty of examples showing us the same such as people losing jobs because of a computer program. This might sound a little hypothetical but it isn't, recent survey has found out that many people are losing their job as the computer program was able to do the same task more efficiently with less cost. Data entry is one such task, nowadays there are computer programs that run in the background and complete the work of data entry in an hour or two which normal human beings might take a day. So this depicts that as technological advancements happen there is a chance for people to lose their jobs.
In conclusion, it is hard to predict whether we will be having our jobs in the future or not as advancements in automation might make our current job obsolete. As we have seen over the period that, any new technological advancement does take away the jobs of certain people. But this does not mean we will be replaced by machines completely it just means that we need to upskill, just as the people did when the computers were used in our day-to-day life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | sanket_chaudhary | 88 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | me2mahesh114 | 63 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | cluelessme | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Mmddzz3 | 73 | view |
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The internet has had a positive impact on humanity 73
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 54
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 59
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...ving. Being human beings we will always try and find solutions to our problems that cou...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... the invention of barcodes, if barcodes werent invented many people would still have j...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...till have jobs at local grocery stores. As there comes enhancement in technology s...
^^
Line 2, column 720, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...any people are going to be obsolete and theyll have to learn something new. Secondly...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...es hamper the jobs of cleaning staff as theyll be replaced by a machine and in return,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...d has seen an evolution in which people arent losing jobs. So the generations ahead t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ight sound a little hypothetical but it isnt, recent survey has found out that many ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5387755102 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45537939296 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473469387755 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4345361914 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249766334222 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825074102697 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100464230595 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174928429954 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790922241301 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.