Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.

It is critically important to grow up young people in the appropriate place. Personally, I believe that children should expend their childhood in municipal area. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, there are a ton of educational places in the urban area, which signifies children can learn new things, and develop themselves. Being near to significant locations such as bookstores, library and preschool will be beneficial for youth because these factors will provide conducive and proper environment for learning. Therefore, kids studying basic things at a young age will be capable of succeeding in the school. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Ten years ago, I and my parents relocated to the capital of Mongolia, my native country, from countryside. When I was in the rural location, purchasing and reading books was remote for me. However, once I start living in the city, I started reading books at the library. Afterwards, I had already been legible when I begin studying at primary school. Hence, learning things at the school was superficial for me. If I had stayed in my indigenous area, I would not have studied reading before I join school. Consequently, people who are accessible to education at a young age will be probably educated, which will lead them to satisfactory life.

Secondly, young people can have many friends if they live in the settlements, which means they will get gregarious individuals later. This is because they will get companions with other kids, and learn how to interact with others. On the other hand, children living in the countryside seem having no peers, which is the reason why people from rural area are unsociable. For example, when I was young, I had no friends in the countryside, which caused me to exclusively play with toys. Thereby, I have been introvert because I could not learn to communicate with others. If I had lived in the city, since I was born, I would have been mastered to have a conversation with people. Drawing from my own experience, young people living in the municipal parcel will have many companions, thus they will learn to be friendly to others.

In summation, I am of the opinion of living in the urban location will provide many opportunities for the young people. This is because they will be able to explore things associated with learning, and interact with other children.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-05 Vivian Chang 80 view
2023-06-05 Vivian Chang 70 view
2023-04-03 Hibahtabbaa 70 view
2023-04-03 Hibahtabbaa 70 view
2022-11-17 Doggie 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user DaVa20011218 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, there are a ton of educat...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95169082126 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81366857422 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509661835749 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8005351879 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1304347826 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997744508135 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344415418974 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304098380743 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769925130703 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193695447316 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.