Do you agree or disagree with following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
From the down side of humanity, most of people attempt to gain knowledge related to one specific subject in order to apply them in their life, or suggest them to others for having better life. How possible become an expert in one filed or many academic subjects has been a controversial question which is much talked about not only by sociologist but also opened minder citizens. It is hard to reach a consensus about whether enlarge their knowledge of many fields with shallow deep or try to be an expert in one specific subject. From my point of view, I disagree with the statement and it is better to follow a specific field. I will explicate my reasons, why I prefer to specialize in one subject, as the following paragraphs.
To commence, the first equisetic reason deserves to be mentioned is that when people focus on specific fields and try to be an expert at it, they can learn and help other people more than having a broad knowledge of many aspects of sciences. As a result, people with a broad knowledge have shallow-deep concentrated on each subject, so they can answer any questions about them or guide other people to choose their ways. Therefore, people could not rely on them because of their negligible knowledge on the each subject. In my experience, when I worked at a big company, I had a boss, who had a broad knowledge of many fields related or not related to his work. In contrast, not only did his knowledge and experiences help us, but also were they an obstacle to progress in our work. He could not choose the best option between two situations, and he always was in doubt which one is correct.
The last but not least important reason is that people does not have enough time to gain a broad knowledge of many fields. Relevant statistics in this area verify this issue that more than half of people can end just one field and be an expert in it. Therefore, there are a few intelligence people in the history, who can be an expert in more than one field like Aboali Sina who was a famous doctor and philosophy in his time. Other example is Anishtain who was an eminent scientist in his time. As a result, it is not possible for everyone to gain a broad knowledge and be expert on them.
To wrap it up, based on aforementioned arguments in the above paragraphs, gaining a specific knowledge of one field is more beneficial than having a broad knowledge of many subject with shallow concentrated. Actually, there are some other reasons and examples, supported this issue, which are not mentioned above. I firmly recommended that people try to be an expert in one field, which they eager and love. If they are an expert in one field, they would help to promote their society.
- Integrated 21 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teacher assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would he more satisfying. 70
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. 60
- TPO 29 – Integrated 65
How possible become an expert in one filed or many academic subjects has been a controversial question
Description: can you re-write this sentence? related to 'how'
whether enlarge their knowledge of many fields with shallow deep or try to be an expert in one specific subject.
Description: can you re-write this sentence? related to 'whether'
the first equisetic reason deserves to be mentioned is that
the first equisetic reason which deserves to be mentioned is that
not only did his knowledge and experiences help us, but also were they an obstacle to progress in our work.
Description: Not only...but also is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
people does not have enough time
people do not have enough time
which they eager and love
which they are eager and love
Sentence: To commence, the first equisetic reason deserves to be mentioned is that when people focus on specific fields and try to be an expert at it, they can learn and help other people more than having a broad knowledge of many aspects of sciences.
Error: equisetic Suggestion: ?
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Read a good grammar book.
No. of Words: 485 while No. of Different Words: 209
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 485 350
No. of Characters: 2167 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.693 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.468 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.496 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.117 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.351 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.511 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.16 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5