There are different opinions on whether it is better for people to live in one city during their lifetime or move from one city to another. Even though some people think that people should change their town if they have the chance and experience new things by doing so, I believe otherwise, maintaining that the disadvantages of moving from one place to another outweigh its advantages. People should stay in one city and build their future and their families future in that place. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that moving from one city to another city is time-consuming and expensive. People should spend a lot of time moving their stuff from their previous apartment into a truck and moving them again from the truck to their new apartment. Plus, people should pay for workers to help them in the whole moving process and rent a truck to haul their stuff from their city to the new one, which is not affordable. Therefore, this reason manifests that changing cities repeatedly is neither cost-effective nor rational.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that moving from one city to another city poses people anxiety and distress, both young and adults. Adults may confront some troubles and difficulties in finding proper jobs, so financial issues give rise to stress and mental problems. Likewise, children face some troubles on their own scale. They may have some difficulties making friends and would not be able to get along with new people. As a result, they experience a very challenging childhood and raise without a friend and under the pressure of moving from one place to another. Drawing from my own experience, when I was a child, we used to move from one city to another city every year because of my father's job. I grew up without having any permanent friendships and under so much tension, which caused mental problems for me. If I had lived in one city, I would have many friends and would not have any mental issues now. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that living in one place benefits both children and adults.
To make a long story short, many people are in favor of experiencing new things by living in new towns or cities from year to year. Nevertheless, the foregoing points lead us to conclude that changing the city where people live is not only prohibitive but also puts both adults and young mental health at risk.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First th 80
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 27The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE There were unusually harsh winters and glaciers grew larger in many areas Scientist have long wondered what 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83928571429 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55574021288 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9215175465 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.105263158 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5789473684 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26885066541 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928810263814 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714005787242 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171814428919 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568602293328 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.