Being cautious is an inherent warning that is the best way to protect against the hazard. Dangers are surrounding us, and we need to be cautious. Our ancestors learned that working should be done more cautiously for surviving, and every careless means that were surviving will fall in danger. Nowadays, our world is not as dangerous as our ancestors experienced, but our world also has distinct perils that we should be aware of and put safety first, so i agree with this statement.
First of all, I would like to say that we should be cautious due to unstoppable hazards around us, which can hurt us, so we should be knowledgeable about dangerous subjects and the solving methods. Some of these dangers happen in one minute but affect for a long time. For example, an earthquake is a critical event that we should know about. Furthermore, we should allocate safe places for necessary situations and check these places for the probability of danger.
The second point that I would like to mention is that we should do our affairs as well as possible. It is our job because we should know that every work we do will return to us. Your sins will find you out. So now we should do our duty as safe instead of being sorry in the future. For instance, near our home, there was an apartment made by an architect, and he did not work correctly and ignored safety instructions. He cut corners. Because of his neglect, one worker died, and he was confronted with different problems for a long time.
To sum up, neglect of safety issues is easier than working carefully, but we will be engaged in consistent suffering due to neglect. Also, the lull is along with attention to safety issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 455, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ld be aware of and put safety first, so i agree with this statement. First of al...
^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... these dangers happen in one minute but affect for a long time. For example, an earthquake...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h different problems for a long time. To sum up, neglect of safety issues is e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64548494983 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56226583432 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4056018566 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7058823529 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924582803766 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334908428943 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407341079844 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581537908441 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334227599869 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.