Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to work in a large company than in a small one. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As the global market is prospering, all kinds of companies have sprung up built up in recent years. Some people prefer to work in a large, powerful, well-organized company while others would rather work in a small one. And I am in favor of the latter for the following reasons.
Firstly, working atmosphere in a small company is better. With fewer people to work with, a person can quickly remember names of every co-worker and get familiar with them. Working with a bunch of well-known[ friends makes employees feel relaxed and comfortable. In a sense, A small company is another home. In contrast, there are too many workers in a large company. Except a few colleagues in the same group, other colleagues are totally strangers. It doesn't seem to be important, but problems show up when two different departments have to cooperate. How can two groups of strangers be considerate for each other at the very beginning? They require a long time to get on well. However, this problem doesn't exist in a small company.
Secondly, because of lack in human resource, small companies tend not to divide labor in detail. In other words, unlike large company employees, most small company employees aren't defined to a certain limited working field and have more opportunities to take over different kinds of work and deal with different kinds of problems. Thus, working in a small company really trains and enhances a person's ability. Meanwhile, it's easier for a person to make significant progress and get promoted in a small company than in a big one. So I think a small company is a better place to work in.
Thirdly, for the reason that employees are familiar with each other and without unnecessary departments, works are done in a more efficient way in a small company. My friend Alex and I used to go to computer companies for internship and both of us have the experience of being assigned to buying stationery for the office. He worked in a small company, while I worked in a big one. Alex bought the objects in the morning and he got the fee in the afternoon right after he handed on the receipts as well as the stationery. Unlucky for me, I had to report the cost to three different bosses and get their signatures. As a result, I didn't get my expense paid until the third morning. Sometimes, works complicated procedures in large companies are really inconvenient and waste time. That's why I prefer to work in a small company.
To sum up, compared with to those large companies with everything stable, small companies may be immature but are fulfilled with chances to make a difference and more familiar people to work with. From my point of view, it's better to be a future star of a small company than just a monotonous part of a big company. It is true that working in a small company with a comfortable working atmosphere seems to full of hope for future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | savikx | 76 | view |
| 2017-02-13 | Angelina2016 | 73 | view |
- Tpo6-W1 3
- 31-Integrated writing 4 3
- 27-W1 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...them. Working with a bunch of well-known[ friends makes employees feel relaxed an...
^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space after the opening parenthesis
Suggestion: [
...them. Working with a bunch of well-known[ friends makes employees feel relaxed and...
^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...er colleagues are totally strangers. It doesnt seem to be important, but problems show...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 702, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e to get on well. However, this problem doesnt exist in a small company. Secondly, be...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...employees, most small company employees arent defined to a certain limited working fi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ll company really trains and enhances a persons ability. Meanwhile, its easier for a pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 631, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nd get their signatures. As a result, I didnt get my expense paid until the third mor...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 781, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...are really inconvenient and waste time. Thats why I prefer to work in a small company...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, i think, in contrast, as a result, as well as, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2361.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68452380952 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70202183358 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498015873016 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5636127429 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4137931034 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3793103448 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.48275862069 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293587318973 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880806468339 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687023565206 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190494046087 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512906771386 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.