Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
governments are responsible to improve life quality for all citizens and they have to spend a specific budget on various and imperative issues. When it comes to spending the money on the improvement of internet access or public transportation some controversy arises. I believe governments should invest in the former issue. In the ensuing lines, I will explain two reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First, people spend more time on the internet rather than in their ways. Nowadays, people spend long hours on the internet for communication, fun, learning, etc. so they need the internet at a fast speed. so widespread is the internet that people always look for companies with the highest speed. As a result, governments have to spend as much as they can to improve the internet to facilitate people's life. On the other hand, people spend less amount of time on public vehicles and in most cases they use personal cars which draw back the importance of public transportation. Take me as an example, rarely do I use public transportation and whenever I am in a bus or subway I spend time on the internet and if I have access to the internet with high speed, I will not care about traffic or crowds.
Second, people need the internet for every single task and it can improve the economy of countries. these days, people need the internet for everything including renting a car, studying, watching a movie, etc. Therefore, poor internet access can get many people in trouble. besides, many companies work with others overseas through the internet and poor access can put their position and income in danger. Moreover, through smartphones and the internet, many jobs have been created which lead to a better economy since people can do different tasks by installed applications on their phones. All of these need proper internet access and it is the governments' duty to provide it. For instance, there is a company in my country whose name is Sib. it is a well-known company that provides people with taxies, in other words, it is like Uber. Several months ago the company had a problem with the internet and the application could not work for almost 50 hours. The company estimated that 46000 people lost their access to the application and got in trouble for renting a car. besides, the company lost one million dollars in such a short time.
In conclusion, based on aforementioned explanations and examples, I believe governments should spend more money to improve internet access because people use the internet more than public transportation; in addition, people need the internet for a wide array of tasks and it can improve countries' economy.
- Nowadays, children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smartphone, video games, for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children's development. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 68
- TPO extra 3, anting 73
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
governments are responsible to improve life quality...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...they need the internet at a fast speed. so widespread is the internet that people ...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...t can improve the economy of countries. these days, people need the internet for ever...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
... access can get many people in trouble. besides, many companies work with others overse...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ed proper internet access and it is the governments duty to provide it. For instance, there...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ompany in my country whose name is Sib. it is a well-known company that provides p...
^^
Line 3, column 1073, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...n and got in trouble for renting a car. besides, the company lost one million dollars i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9418344519 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76835310408 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48322147651 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4688371266 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0434782609 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4347826087 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30434782609 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360373133291 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109650554892 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08647924473 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273468879605 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077811816687 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.