Spending money to improve the internet on public transportation by the government is an interesting idea to talk about. In personally agree with that because of two main reasons. First, in the digital world we live, having access to information whenever and wherever is of great importance. Second, moving around city by public transportation is boring and to overcome this boredom, using internet would be a great help. In the following paragraphs I will explain my reasons in more detail.
First, This strange digital new world, has forced people to be fast. This means that not only having access to information is important but also the swiftness of providing this information is of great importance. So it sounds reasonable using internet everywhere. In the other word, people need to access internet on public transportation because they might need to provide information everywhere even on bus or subway. If I want to mention my experience, I remember the time that I was heading to my university by bus and one day I should've send some documents for one of my friends before we go to class. That time my phone hadn't access to internet neither the bus, so that day I couldn't send those documents.
Second, moving around by things like bus or subway is always a boring since they are usually noisy and crowded with people. Internet is a good choice to run away from this boredom. Chatting with friends, playing online games, listening to music online, following news and many so on are options while people have access to internet on public transportation. Me myself for example, play music online while I use bus to get to my university.
In conclusion, I think government should spend more money to equip public trsportation with internet since digital world forced us to use internet everywhere we need information and boredom of moving around needs a proper replacement.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 533, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: should've
...g to my university by bus and one day I shouldve send some documents for one of my frien...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...fore we go to class. That time my phone hadnt access to internet neither the bus, so ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...internet neither the bus, so that day I couldnt send those documents. Second, moving a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96202531646 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8379072136 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53164556962 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3113961513 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258654216029 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828219493123 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789192760151 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171042823912 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758135262136 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.