do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
People have the most relationship with each other in their life. This connection causes finding a trustworthy person. Friends have the most role to acquire calm. They are as a mirror for us. In my opinion, if their behavior encompasses beauty characteristics or negative, We make ourselves similar to them. I believe that keeping old friends is much better than looking for new friends. I provides two reasons for my belief in following the above statement and then express them with examples.
First of all, Trust is too valuable to improve the bond between friends. Two old friends know all of their past life until the future, Therefor this causes them to share their secrets. They have recognition in their habits and this is making realization to understand all of the behaviors. These are reasons to have a friendship between themselves. My own experience is a compelling example of this, When I was at university I was interested in a girl though I don't know how to express my motion I shared this point with one of my best friends because I feel he can only help me, regardless I canceled this case after consulting with my brother.
Second, Social position is an important factor to have in your life. When I have friends with high quality of knowledge in their family, This affects their character, For example, make them open-minded, Moreover, this happening evolve my personality as a chain. For instance, Mohsen is one of my old friends. His father is a professor and his mother is a teacher at school. As a result, his character is inconsistent with these parents. The family made him an industrious and studious person who has an especial purpose in his life who struggles with the obstacle to receive which he desires.
In conclusion, strongly believe that maintain old friends is better than searching to make new friends. Old friends are a pic of our delicate or sadness experience. We can keep them with confidence and they can transform our beliefs.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Machli | 70 | view |
2020-01-28 | King harald | 73 | view |
2020-01-28 | King harald | 70 | view |
2020-01-28 | King harald | 66 | view |
2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 70 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... better than looking for new friends. I provides two reasons for my belief in following ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...his is making realization to understand all of the behaviors. These are reasons to have a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ity I was interested in a girl though I dont know how to express my motion I shared ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8550295858 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7702941998 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.1642856664 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1428571429 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0952380952 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230275174465 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713829462936 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747135678185 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162398253456 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679508897931 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.