Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical.
The way to develop a country has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that holds it more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than practical things. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, country development is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that investing in beautiful things is synonymous with generating a magnificent image of the country. Thanks to this, the country is likely to attract investors from all around the world. Accordingly, it is capable of getting plenty of taxes. With this in mind, it stands a golden chance to enlarge more tax revenues and receive tons of financial advantages. Eventually, this probably gives rise to economic advancement. More notably, while the government is investing in beautiful things, raising more interaction and affiliation with other advancing nations is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for the country to share their point of view with problems with other nations. On the ground of that, it is possible for the country to reflect on itself and recognize the strength and weaknesses of its statistics. During this process, it is prone to encourage itself better with higher efficiency. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for the country to develop the country in many aspects. Given these points, investing in beautiful things greatly contributes to country development.
On the other hand, some people express a different view that investing in beautiful things discourages the country from ameliorating life standard of population by the influence of pecuniary embarrassment. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on country development. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. The country has already well thought about the plan. Incidentally, there is a certain principle about investing in beautiful things. Therefore, it is unlikely that putting a majority of money in the process of making beautiful things force the country to face tremendous financial difficulties. Another point often overlooked is that even if the pecuniary embarrassment does exist, it should be considered as the chance for it to generate things that have a symbolic meaning of the country. By the same token, it has an incentive to gain more prestige from other countries. By virtue of this, the country is given the opportunity to obtain multitudinous advantages, which creates a significant impact on the current situation. Beyond any doubt, their worthwhile endeavor bring about a dramatic change to the woeful state of the country's infrastructure. This, indeed, empowers the country to ameliorate the life standard of populations. By and large, people should put off the idea that investing in beautiful things prevents the country to improve the quality of citizen's life.
In summary, country development is the convincing reason for my approval. It is my hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the way to develop the country.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement As modern life gets more and more complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 73
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees 83
- People should take time to relax with hobbies or physical activities that very different from what they do at work 73
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2651.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21850393701 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99780012653 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2054879188 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4137931034 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5172413793 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44827586207 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239677023953 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637011372188 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10252449698 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166598821127 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983965174797 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.