Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees

The most essential thing for the firm to invest in has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that the most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, investment efficiency and employee progression are what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that invest, to enhance the skills of employees, is synonymous with broadening employees' horizons and deepening their knowledge. Accordingly, they are capable of having a solid foundation of knowledge. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to find and understand their problems precisely. Eventually, this probably gives rise to ameliorate the qualities and abilities to make independent judgments and to solve problems better. More notably, while companies are investing for skills improvement of workers, having a precautionary measure warding off employees' failures is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for employees to gain more sense of reassurance. On the ground of that, they can focus on working for greater corporate responsibility. During this process, they are prone to undertake complicated works with higher efficiency and accuracy. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for them to avert the unintended consequences caused by unsatisfactory skills.
On the other hand, some people express a different view that using money in skills enhancement of workers is often meaningless procrastination for the company to proceed with their tasks. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on employee progression. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. The company has already well thought about the plan. Incidentally, there is the apparent purposefulness of their efforts. Therefore, it is unlikely that expend money in the skills amelioration of workers prevents them from obtaining the felicitous choice for time management.
Another point often overlooked is that even if meaningless procrastination does exist, it should be considered as the chance for employees to have an enjoyable and high-quality experience. By the same token, they have an incentive to inspire and motivate themselves to make strenuous efforts. They are allowed to get satisfaction out of realizing themselves develop and reach some of their goals and abilities, which creates a significant impact on the current situation. Beyond any doubt, they tend to relieve tension and promote circulation to make the brain more active. Thus, indeed, empowers them to accomplish satisfactory results. By and large, people should put off the idea that investing in the improvement of workers' skills impedes the company's progress.
In summary, investment efficiency and employee progression are the convincing reasons for my approval. I hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the most essential thing for the firm to invest.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-27 VietNhat. 83 view
2021-06-27 VietNhat. 83 view
2021-06-27 VietNhat. 83 view
2020-03-21 syuku 80 view
2020-03-17 zhaodejian 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user VietNhat. :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...it is unlikely that expend money in the skills amelioration of workers prevents them f...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2593.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4133611691 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14726731569 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542797494781 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 810.9 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3854366489 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.037037037 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7407407407 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222945824164 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601685795333 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834449269638 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131377904999 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551489324896 0.0645574589148 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 86.8835125448 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.