Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to
understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and
examples to support your answer.
In school, I and my twin sister were very competitive when it came to academics. We were quite different methods when it came to learning. She was the one that learn about different topics from various subjects like learning facts. Contrasting her, my way was very clear and simple as to understand the reasoning, logic, and motive of concepts which help me remember things longer. Hence I support the fact that students should understand ideas instead of learning them as facts. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
Firstly, I was poor at remembering things since childhood whether it was letters, numbers, tables, and sometimes names. So my mother helped me develop a method to understand things first and then try to remember them, which helped me learn things quicker. Yes, there were few concepts or things on which this method did not work, where I had to write them down several times, or continuously use them to mug them up. During these times I thought looking at my sister that maybe her method is not completely wrong. But, as we grew and kept on going into higher grades, we realized that with few modifications my method was way better when it came to learning different subjects simultaneously. She was not able to remember all the concepts whether it was science, mathematics, geography, or social studies. As, the human brain is a mysterious organ, and after a point, we can't remember things clearly until we apply them or use, or recall them regularly. I agree, maybe in a subject like a history, sometimes we do need to remember concepts like facts. Similarly, in mathematics and science, we do need to remember some formulas to make our work easier. But, to remember them for a long time, understanding the derivation behind those formulas helps us in a great way.
Now, I and my sister have chosen different majors, and the method to understanding ideas and concepts has proved to be feasible. For instance, consider a teacher or professor who is going to teach you a new concept related to the subject. Chances seem to be higher than if the professor is not very familiar with the topic, and he chose to rely on his memory for facts of those concepts, then he will not be able to teach you. Another real-life scenario we can take is using algorithms, charts, and the flow process. In today's fast-moving world, big tech companies also use these methods of algorithms and charts to explain or note down long, lengthy, complex codes of software. They use it because it helps revising, remembering, understanding, or even explaining concepts in a flow, or logical manner.
In conclusion, I fully support the method to understand in-depth any concepts and ideas to learn anything. And students should be applying this method in their studies as well, as in past and present it has proven to help even a callow, uneducated person to learn with efficacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Rasika0511 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo Inc a chain of hobby shops Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon We discovered that there a 53
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 58
- Thankfully with the passage of time we ve seen more and more campaigns to reduce the usage of wood products in our everyday life They represent one of the main contributors to global climate change so it s an absolute must that we have to remove them from 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs 87
- Nuclear power plants are really devastating for the nature The nuclear waste that is created as a result of fission stays radioactive for thousands of years Also we had several nuclear disasters that have proven how unstable this whole system is There are 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...s which help me remember things longer. Hence I support the fact that students should...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...pletely wrong. But, as we grew and kept on going into higher grades, we realized that wi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 872, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...mysterious organ, and after a point, we cant remember things clearly until we apply ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1253, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rivation behind those formulas helps us in a great way. Now, I and my sister have chosen di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to revise' or 'revise'.
Suggestion: to revise; revise
... software. They use it because it helps revising, remembering, understanding, or even ex...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81312127237 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68182233369 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51689860835 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.86738351254 643% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5244521042 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9583333333 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23082179949 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681306301674 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604579959057 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152945328878 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219878732121 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.