Government funds should be devoted to improving society. Many areas are in need of government investments, such as public transportation and internet access. Whereas some people believed that funds should be contributed to promoting Internet access, others argued that public transportation should be the first choice. Personally, I agree with the former one. I justify my opinion for two reasons which I will examine in the essay.
To begin with, students rely on the internet to have classes. Obviously, face-to-face classes are impossible to hold during pandemics like Coronavirus. In fact, a large proportion of schools use virtual classes to teach, which rely heavily on the internet connection. If there’s no available network, students are unable to have classes during pandemics. For instance, after my city got severely impacted by the virus, my school swiftly switched to teaching online classes. Each teacher had a special meeting number, and students were asked to join the meeting. Thanks to the online meeting, enabling us to learn new content in a virtual way. This technology depends on the internet connection speed heavily, and I can’t imagine how students’ daily life will change without access to the internet.
Moreover, there are many job opportunities posted on the internet. For people who are unemployed, there is a pool of job resources online. People who are searching for jobs can easily find their ideal job on the internet, because of the massive amount of jobs listed online, and the filter function that job websites provided makes the process of job searching even more efficient. This can be demonstrated by my cousin Danny, a graduate student in need of a job relating to Chemistry. After Danny graduated from college, he tried several methods of job finding, including looking for jobs in the newspaper and asking friends and professors, however, he didn’t find the opportunity he dreamed of. Then, he went online and searched for keywords like “Chemistry Job”, and there were a bunch of career opportunities listed on the webpage. Consequently, Danny took a job vacancy in a Chemistry lab on the internet. Evidently, the network was far easier in helping Danny to be employed. If there were no available internet, it would take Danny a great amount of time to search for jobs in newspapers.
Admittedly, public transportation is also crucial for our daily life, but the advantages of the network, including online teaching and job searching, outweighed the benefits that transportation brought to us.
In a nutshell, I am of the opinion that government should invest in network accessibility since it enables students to learn virtually and ease people’s searching for jobs.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a virtual way" with adverb for "virtual"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eting, enabling us to learn new content in a virtual way. This technology depends on the interne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, whereas, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2700228833 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92746667093 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551487414188 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1929793822 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9583333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2083333333 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.20833333333 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154620759122 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487071527203 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438649381511 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981803912741 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596612994069 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.