Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, the Internet is ubiquitous in our daily life, which provides plenty of convenience including the online map, social media, and online payment. I would say that for governments, it is more significant to increase Internet access than to increase public transportation because of the great developing potential of the Internet and the high value of the industries followed.
After so many years of growth, we still have not seen the top of the Internet. In other words, it owns an enormous capacity. There are a number of genius assumptions that have been proposed years ago. Nonetheless, limited by the development of the Internet, the majority of them have failed to be taken into practice. Once realized, any of them may change our lives on a large scale. For instance, Ali Pay, a tool for online payment, did not become prevail until the popularization of the Internet. Its appearance was a shock to our society for it defined a new way of paying. We no longer have to take any cash with us and all way need to do is scan the QR code and type the password to pay the money. Besides Ali Pay which is brought into reality for a while, other technologies such as VR and AR, also possess high expectations by the public.
As a technology that could be blended into many fields, the Internet has a unique economic value. According to statistics, more than half of new startup companies are related to the Internet. With the help of the Internet, they can easily promote their business to the whole country, and this is extremely important to their survival. Nearly most of the old industries can be boosted by the Internet. One example is agriculture. In the past, farmers must harvest their crops before they manage to sell them in the market to earn their living. However, through the Internet, farmers are capable to exhibit their crops to the national market and make reservations so that they don't need to worry about redundant crops.
For all reasons I have mentioned above, I can safely draw the conclusion that governments should assign more funds to develop Internet access than to improve public transportation.
- When a new technological device becomes available some people buy it right away others wait until many have adopted it Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving schools is the most important factor for the successful development of a country 60
- High salaries with high risks of losing a job or low salary and secure job Which would you prefer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rket and make reservations so that they dont need to worry about redundant crops. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, still, while, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84153005464 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72842356347 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1162902946 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2631578947 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209868843962 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547699851122 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621502512257 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142308317207 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663790053259 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.