Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that the government should spend nation money to expanding services that could benefit more part of society and improving public transportation would be more comprehensive. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that in the modern lifestyle internet is an essential part of all people life and government should attempt to improve it. However, I to a great extent, disagree with this idea that it is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
First and foremost, the first concern in both developed and under developing countries is environmental pollutions, like some dangerous gasses or harsh noises produced by the huge movement of motor vehicles. These kinds of pollution threatened people healthy and happiness. The expansion of public transportation not only can significantly reduce toxic elements but also it provides beautiful and more enjoyable picture for big cities.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that public transportation have a remarkable effect on the welfare of the poor class of society. It is fair because people with low income have not afforded to buy cars, but they pay tax like all other portion of society. So it is fair. In addition through improving public transportation quality, encourage people to prefer it to their car that will decrease traffic in the city.
Finally, yet importantly, It is true that improving Internet access is important mater for today life, but Internet services has more potential for attracting privet investment. In recent decades Internet becomes impartable part of the business and daily life. Development of technology and the increase in electronic services, joint more and more people to Internet users. This fact creates a great investment opportunity for big companies to improve and expand Internet access, thus it is better than the government spend money on lower attractive but very important services.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that it is more important for the government to spend money to improve public transportation that improving Internet access. Because it has a very crucial role in people healthy and can increase poor people welfare and also it is not very favorable for privet company investment.
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 48
- One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them take a part time job 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...r portion of society. So it is fair. In addition through improving public transportation...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, thus, in addition, it is true, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36170212766 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93262196952 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523936170213 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6038711289 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362832541663 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124700547194 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149198253692 0.0737576698707 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205530161194 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130828345515 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.