Nowadays it is commonly accepted that people have a serious concern about companies or people who sacrifice accuracy for a higher rate of outputs. So they believe that it is better to work slowly and make sure that everything is right. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that, if each part of country's economic system could not harmonized themselves with high speed of our world, would not be able to remain or progress. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that in today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
First and foremost, today still the quality of products has priority to more optional products but with low quality. For example, iPhone is the most well-known and oldest company of cell-phone. This company approximately every year demonstrate a new model of cell-phone. Nonetheless, some new appear cell-phone companies in order to compete with iPhone try to introduce several new models with more option and lower price to market. In spite of this their products never could replace iPhone because of a lot of bugs in their hardware.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that sometimes mistakes are not reversible. For instance, several years ago, in my country Iran, a construction company started the project of building a dam on one of the important rivers to provide consuming water of nearby cities. However, in order to reduce costs and time of the project, they do not complete the research phase of the project carefully and it creates a huge disaster. They built a dam on the very salty ground and it leads to all of the river water that collected behind dam became salty and unusable. Unfortunately, attempts to solving this problem have not been successful.
Finally, yet importantly, this interest for increasing fast became a seriously threatened for the future of societies. Now all people are demanding for decreasing the speed of the world. The high speed in the recent decades not only reduced standard of human life, but also lack of consideration put health and welfare of people in the huge risk. For instance, change of food patterns and use of harmful and low nutritional food, be sap of natural environment and appearance of new infectious diseases and increase in the frequency of mental disorders all are the consequence of a high speed working and risky decisions.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that the quality and accuracy is still more important than high productivity. Because people are more demanding for quality, and a lot of mistakes are unrecoverable and now people preferred to slow down their high rate world.
- TPO44-Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 48
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 73
- TPO 40 60
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'harmonize'
Suggestion: harmonize
...t of countrys economic system could not harmonized themselves with high speed of our world...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n the very salty ground and it leads to all of the river water that collected behind dam b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in spite of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98494623656 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72221540298 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529032258065 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0838506641 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252577264794 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753324279267 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166935711544 0.0737576698707 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137169857919 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166364799524 0.0645574589148 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.