Space travel and space exploration is not a myth anymore. It is not uncommon that many countries to start developing their space travel technology. However, some people criticize the high cost of spending money on space travel or exploration. From my perspective, governments spending money to fund space expeditions has positive impacts on society.
To begin with, powerful space travel technologies can equip the country with high competitivity in global affairs, which would potentially increase the reputation in the competition and collaboration between different countries. Space travel technologies represent the top level of a country's synthesized ability. The country that has these technologies has a great advantage in negotiating with other countries such as sharing information and collaborating and cooperation on specific topics related to space exploration, which means that it will also bring the country the power to bargain in a diplomatic situation by and large. For example, the Chinese government with the technology of landing on the moon can have the power to express their opinion on the global stage in discussing spatial justice and regulations collectively with other counties that also have advanced technologies. Therefore, investing money in space travel can improve the speaking of a county.
In addition to the advantage in global affairs, promoting space travel can also be beneficial to a country's own development of scientific research. Since space travel and space exploration need many high-tech devices and experiments as well as outstanding scientists and researchers from all fields to collaborate together to come over difficulties. During the process, the government not only needs to strengthen the productivity of space research but also the educational system in the university since the students there are the quasi-engineers and quasi-scientists in the future. And not to mention the equipment and scientific facilities that the university might get from the funding of the government, which can also benefit other related disciplinary such as computer science, artificial intelligence, etc. All science subjects will have a great leap forward because of the investment in space.
Admittedly, many people might think that if the government spends money on space travel, there will be less investment in other public welfare. But actually, with the advent of technology and the improvement of life quality, a rich economy nowadays can afford the high cost of space travel, as well as space research, which not conflicts with the money that invests in the development of other public expenditures such as affordable housing, public transportations, etc. More importantly, space exploration might discover other habitats that are also suitable for human beings in the future or discover a novel fuel that exists on other planets, which will create a significant impact on the earth to relieve our burden of fuel shortage, ecological problems, overpopulations, etc. Thus, it is a long-durational investment that guarantees a brighter future that benefits all of us.
To sum up, based on the positive impacts on global reputation, improvement of domestic research, and increasing the public welfare in the future, the benefits are worthy of funding space travel and exploration.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 73
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 3
- People across North America and elsewhere who enjoy watching birds put out devices called bird feeders and continually supply them with seed This practice is especially popular during the fall and winter when natural food sources for the birds become scar 68
- Some people believe that children should assist with household chores when they are old enough Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this Please provide specific reasons details and examples to support your response 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, speaking of, such as, as well as, by and large, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2826.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56299212598 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17547691966 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478346456693 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 885.6 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.1527458433 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.736842105 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7368421053 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270270724637 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109058822478 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607541421589 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174476057736 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633094969234 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.