People across North America and elsewhere who enjoy watching birds put out devices called bird feeders and continually supply them with seed This practice is especially popular during the fall and winter when natural food sources for the birds become scar

The lecture and the reading passage discuss whether the fireworks in a North American town are responsible for the birds' deaths. The lecturer contradicts the three reasons presented in the reading. These are the following reasons.

First of all, the lecture states that the location of the death place is out of town, which is too far from the location of the fireworks. This directly contradicts the first point presented in the reading that the timing of the bird's death coincides with the fireworks.

Secondly, birds can also die from injuries just caused by striking the ground. The lecturer claims that some people witness the birds fall to the ground without any trees or buildings nearby, which might be because of air pressure or strong wind. It is no connection with the fireworks. This contradicts the statement made in the reading that the birds have died from injuries caused by the impact of the fireworks.

Last, the red-winged blackbird is the most common species in this area. Therefore, these birds easily fall victim to any of these kinds of events, which can simply explain the phenomenon that most of the dead birds were the same species. The reason demonstrated in the reading is not convincing.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...d in the reading that the timing of the birds death coincides with the fireworks. ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98048780488 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50730758279 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8527231713 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0833333333 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18312122547 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612173910781 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494910798923 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108182826736 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225876902864 0.0443174109184 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.