It is indisputable that space exploration has been one of the people’s dream since childhood, and people always have been thinking about traveling to space since they were a child. In today’s turbulent economic environment, it is arduous for the government to decide which area they should disburse the money on, monitory of people take a view that it is imperative for the government to spend an inordinate amount of their budget to this field, however, there is broad consensus regarding to useless of this disbarment. To be frank, as far as I concerned, I believe that there are other types of field that would more beneficial for human. I would explain the numbers of these fields which are more conspicuous for me in the following essay.
First and foremost, although there seen to be number of benefits associated with exploring space travel does not a priority over any other matter such as space exploration. My personal experience would be a great example of this matter, in these days my country is experiencing the high level of brain drain due to lack of sufficient developed university and school which causes people to go abroad in order to find the reliable job and precious university, and last year I had to move to another country to attend to university which I underwent many hardships, if my government had spent some of their budgets to educational system instead of space exploration, an inordinate amount of people would not have compelled to go abroad.
A second significant problem that deserves some words here is that the consequence of overspending of government for space exploration not only hit close to the aforementioned problem but also affect infrastructure such as public transportation and so on. If the government spends a huge amount of their budget for space exploration, the government will encounter a shortage of its budget in order to maintain and fix public transportation. I recently read a report from the newspaper which pointed out that within three-decade certain countries in South Asia will suffer from outdated infrastructure as a result of overspending of government in abortive field such as spacecraft, additionally, the news pointed out that those counties due to lack of sufficient road and low-quality road reveals that people had to cope with different problem.
To sum up, due to the aforementioned reasons I discussed above I believe that the government should spend its budget in another field such as infrastructure and education which will help our country to prosper earlier.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity 73
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TOEFL T P O 43 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...pos;s dream since childhood, and people always have been thinking about traveling to space since...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 722, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of people would not have compelled to go abroad. A second significant problem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10023866348 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07228232206 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515513126492 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 20.1344086022 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 135.487600909 48.9658058833 277% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 213.7 100.406767564 213% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.9 20.6045352989 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177101715648 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783543427903 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477687145312 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100145250178 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046213319532 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 11.7677419355 200% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 58.1214874552 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.1575268817 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.0537634409 183% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.