Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration.
In today's modern administrative system, due to the shortage of budget, the government is nearly so cautious about the spending money on different part of society. However, most scientists believe that investment in space-related investigations are more necessary than wasting money and I personally agree with this notion by presenting two main in the subsequent paragraphs.
First, funding for space research can help the human being to be ready for the upcoming problems. What I am interested to get across is that governments try to develop more researches in order to find the cause of some mysterious phenomena which are happening in the world. In this way, the government establish more well-equiped departments all around the world to hire well-known scholars to do more specific researches on the relation between space matters and all the weird events are happening in the earth. One of the prominent institution, NASA, has been funded by US government, where the astromomer have launched more shuttles or space crafts to other planets to find the answer for some unquestionable problems which are happening in the earth. It can be concluded that the governments want to spend money in this way to predict some problems may happen in the near future to protect humanity and all other creatures against upcoming dangerous problems.
Moreover, investing money for space research can lead to design more developed technologies. The more human are facing new things the more they are able to create new tools. In this way, funding enough money in space exploration can encourage researchers to look beyond our earth and extend their knowledge to the other aliens objects in the more far planets. As a result, by looking carefully at the whole events and the processes which happened in the other planets, we can imitate the materials of that process to invent new tools that will help human-being in tackling the problems. For instance, based on some information that I received from a scientific-fiction movie, the Hubble detector found an unknown elements in the surface of Mars with tremendous amounts of radium was emitted out of its core. When that elements had been carried to the earth, scientists had figured out that it can be utilized as a tumor targeting probe due to the radiant releasing capability. With all this in mind, by spending money on fields like astronomy we can find some helpful methods in other planet then bring them to earth and recreate that process or tools to help the humanity in different aspects of life.
In conclusion, with all these arguments taken into accounts, funding money in space researches not only does help human-being to cope with unprecedented problems in the earth but also let scholars develop some techniques by mimicking the process which are happening in the alien planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the spending money on different part of society. However, most scientists believ...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...equiped departments all around the world to hire well-known scholars to do more s...
^^
Line 9, column 714, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'element'?
Suggestion: element
...e, the Hubble detector found an unknown elements in the surface of Mars with tremendous ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10944206009 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83927962291 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530042918455 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8174906254 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.733333333 100.406767564 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0666666667 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198486350916 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767002504694 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584521045496 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140869277257 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264457467369 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.