Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Following Statement? Large cities should ban cars from the city center. Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer

Essay topics:

Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Following Statement? Large cities should ban cars from the city center. Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer

In the modernization and globalization world, a car is the most useful innovation; however, it causes several troubles in our society. Some people may say that large city should ban cars from the city center and others disagree. However, from my vintage point, I firmly believe cars should ban from the city center for the following significant reasons.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that a car causes the most prominent issue of traffic in a downtown of metro city. Indeed, a car makes life more convenient and one can reach to the destination within a short span of time, though it causes many traffic problems and people have to stuck in their cars for hours. Apparently, the center of a town is a hub for employees and everyone uses a car, this makes city crowded with cars. If the car usage will be stopped then the issue of traffic would be solved and people would able save their time as a time is money in the competitive world. For example, my husband works in the downtown of Atlanta, his office is 9 miles away from our home. However, during the office hours when everyone wants to reach office, it takes him 1 hr. to get his office and the same thing at the time of returning from his work. Hence, cars should be stopped to save time.

Another reason that deserves some words is that usage of public transportation will increase in this scenario. Everyone is aware about benefits of public vehicles. In fact, government will improve tax revenue with the usage of public vehicles instead of private cars. With the help of trains and buses, one can help environment, as cars are major source of air pollution and greenhouse gases. Moreover, the safety of people is also associated with usage of private vehicles. Few days back, I read one survey about New York City, everyday 25 people become victims of car accidents in NYC, most of them are visitors from foreign countries. In order to improve public safety the ban is essential. How one can forget about the world’s leading issue of oil conservation which can be easily solved by a usage of public transportation. It may not create a huge impact on saving fuel but it will help to reserve fuels for few more years. Thus, our society will get a great help from this ban.

The noteworthy interesting research conducted in our countries shows seventy percent people believe the usage of car should be stopped in the city center. Doubtlessly, the problem of car parking would solve and those parking spaces can be used for improvement of our society like museums, parks, a library etc.

In the conclusion, I wisely think the usage of car should ban in the center of city, not only helps it to solve traffic issues but also to improve utility of public transportation. This small change will bring several advancements in our community.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-25 ax400 60 view
2018-06-15 pooja257 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user pooja257 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: VINTAGE_POINT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'vantage point'?
Suggestion: vantage point
...r and others disagree. However, from my vintage point, I firmly believe cars should ban from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... I read one survey about New York City, everyday 25 people become victims of car acciden...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72469635628 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55277524984 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48987854251 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9732790975 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.36 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.76 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218761411994 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683912009081 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852320531603 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149449815386 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104833433127 0.0645574589148 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.