Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Having the best leadership is one of the important pillar of success for each society. Leadership is who lead the efforts of its group to be effective and flourishing. Some people believe that being leadership is an intrinsic characteristic and nobody could gain it through life, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, everyone could learn to be a good leadership although they are not at first for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that spending time in gaining knowledge could improve people's leadership ability. When people deal with learning various fields, they acquire a lot of valuable experience which would be useful in their decision making. Furthermore, they have a chance to better understand themselves and their weakness s, so could strength them and transform themselves to a novel person. For example, when I was kid, I should do a project with my classmates in a group in which I was leadership. Unfortunately, because of my less experience in managing tasks we get a bad result. As time went, I tried to involve in different groups and learned their leaderships knowledge. Also, I accepted critics and worked on my personality. Now, by using all of that valuable information I become a prospers leadership in my own company. If I had not gained knowledge, I wouldn't become a successful leadership.
Second, by increasing connection with society, people could enhance their leadership ability. If people get involve in each of the society's events and absorb all of updated information, they could get familiar with various perspectives which leads them to make their social interaction better which is one of the key factor of a good leadership. For instance, statistics demonstrate that there is a direct relation between the time people spend in society and their leadership ability. Researchers' investigation among two groups reveal people who deal more with other people could leader groups well due to not only they understand people's needs better, but they also have international information which helps them to guide others to reach success. As you can see, people can enhance their leadership ability although they are weak at first.
In conclusion, I do believe that leadership is not intrinsic ability and people could turn themselves to a successful leadership every time. Not only gaining knowledge could strength this ability, but also spending more time in society turn people to a well-known leadership. I think each person should work on itself to become a prospers leadership.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Shiimaaa | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | MRoy | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammadkmi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | marysv | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Boys and girls should attend separate schools. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...mpany. If I had not gained knowledge, I wouldnt become a successful leadership. Se...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1985472155 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92024341201 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503631961259 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.374025516 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.238095238 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146890739094 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541622370787 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305915929702 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102709486652 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024522126671 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.