Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader
Some career improves with knowledge, and some progress with practice, but leadership is not teachable. Leadership needs a good leader, and a good leader needs to be smart and aware of all circumstances, Besides they have to have a very high social relationship, which comes naturally. From my perspective, leadership is genetic. Indeed it isn't a kind of personality to learn; it is a talent.
To begin with, any person tries to be a leader in his future career. Still, not all of them successfully achieved this position, even though most of them have a good education and ethical commitment, but not good leadership. One of my previous bosses always said that not all the experts could be good leaders. For example, one of my colleagues is a very good and professional programmer, but he is very quiet and shy; as a result, he never can be a powerful leader because naturally, he is not a boss, and he cant coach others and encourage them to gain their goals.
Secondly, some people think that even if you are not a leader from childhood, you can be a good leader when you go to university and get a degree in the field you like. Indeed, leadership is not relying on what we call academic success. It is based on how you have eager to communicate and get a relation with people you think are useful in your business, which depends on your natural personality. For instance, my sister used to lead her friends when she was a kid and manage them in a way she wanted to reach her goals, this characteristics were inside her from childhood, so when she grew up, she had that personality with her, with the education she has completed her abilities and now she is a very successful manager in her field.
To sum up, leadership and leading a team or group of people is not something you can learn; in contrast, it is something you have, and by growing up and improving your knowledge, you can improve it in a way to gain aims in a short time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... my perspective, leadership is genetic. Indeed it isnt a kind of personality to learn;...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ctive, leadership is genetic. Indeed it isnt a kind of personality to learn; it is a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...use naturally, he is not a boss, and he cant coach others and encourage them to gain...
^^^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cants'.
Suggestion: cants
...use naturally, he is not a boss, and he cant coach others and encourage them to gain...
^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...in a way she wanted to reach her goals, this characteristics were inside her from ch...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in contrast, kind of, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49858356941 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74823162902 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507082152975 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.3417078608 48.9658058833 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.153846154 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240442165215 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903472846758 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468092800938 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145137351122 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337410002694 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.