Tpo10
The reading and the listening debate the problem which causes the sea otter decline. The reading materials believe that the main problem is pollution with providing three reasons, which are contradicted by the following lecture.
Firstly, the reading claims that the pollution such as oil rigs and other chemical resources cause the main reason to cause sea otter reduces. However, the lecturer contradicts the reading by pointing out that the infection because of chemical pollution is not good reason to prove it because if that was the case, many otters should find out in beaches. She believes that predators are the reason to decrees the number of otter.
Secondly, other sea mammal as well as the otter’s declination in this region, in the author's opinion, is caused by environmental pollution other than the predator. In contrast, the professor indicates that it is, in fact, the human being that prey these sea mammals.
Thirdly, the reading materials point out that in some are sea otter are less which in some other places are more, the author thinks that because of the level of pollution base on experience on sample water, they recognize that areas with high pollution otter are less and opposite. In contrast the lecturer claims that some area which is easy to access the otter is less and some shallow are that is difficult to reach by predictors the number of otter is more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the pollution such as oil rigs and other chemical resources cause the main...
^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rigs and other chemical resources cause the main reason to cause sea otter reduc...
^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...er’s declination in this region, in the authors opinion, is caused by environmental pol...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...llution otter are less and opposite. In contrast the lecturer claims that some area wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otter are less and opposite. In contrast the lecturer claims that some area whic...
^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. In contrast the lecturer claims that some area which is easy to access the ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in contrast, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94042553191 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44801080545 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497872340426 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8716313461 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363915640012 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164989910865 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969331429014 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229772374721 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707454829494 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.