Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
God has created all humans with different qualities and abilities. It is important for a person to know about their strengths and weaknesses. Some people are inclined towards the attitude that all individuals can learn all talent, whereas others hold different perspectives. I personally, though believe that leadership is a quality that comes naturally and can not be developed by ourselves. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that some people have very soft hearts and are not able to order anyone which ultimately makes you a lousy leader. They always try to do all works by own instead of ordering the next person either it is the colleague or sibling. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience I am the kind of person who never leads any group because when I was in school my teacher assigned me as a leader of my group project. In addition, I ended up with a disastrous result. At that time I did not realize that I can not lead I do not have such talent After the project I thought when others can lead then why I can not. In order to be a good leader I tried thousands of times, it did not work and I gave up. Therefore, this experience taught me that leadership quality can not be created by a person itself.
Secondly, some people are God gifted with a special quality as it increases the relationship and communication between people. It eventually helps in professional life. To exemplify, my sister can lead everyone in childhood I do remember she was the one who dominates me and my brothers. Whatever she says we have to do it. Moreover, she is smart and knows how to manage things, and makes people do their tasks just because of this quality she got a job as a project manager in a top world company. Thus, this example illustrates that no one can learn to be a leader it is natural.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly believe that extrovert people have good leading qualities as they know how to make communication with others and this quality can not be generated by anyone no matter how much you try.
- Educating children is more difficult today than it was in them past as they spend much of their time on phone social networking media and playing online games do you agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site Use specific reasons and examples to 76
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5404040404 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67175058695 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0791387781 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6315789474 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169716078623 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056875504321 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494959920487 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106752558748 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224937013266 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.