Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.
A controversial issue relating to whether most advertisements make products look better than they really are has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged that the effect of some ads is more effective than real production. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, with a number of special effects, today's ads seem more attractive but are actually different experiences. To be more specific, high technology beautification, professional words as well as exquisite content design are all used to design a commodity advertisement. The advertising designer would manufacture an alluring recommendation for the target merchandise and give the audiences a feeling that this brand has a prodigious result if they quickly use it. Fascinated by the content of the ads, the spectators would not hesitate to pay for it. However, apart from the exaggerated interpretation of the advertisements, the actual use of it may not be spectacular. For example, there are plenty of shampoo ads on the TV. What they tell the families is that if they use shampoo, their hair would instantly become smooth and never knotted. Many individuals decide to try the magic shampoo and they may find a totally different from the facts on the ads. Therefore, compared to the presentation of announcements, the virtual merchandise would not possess those ideal reactions.
In addition, celebrities in the advertisements give ordinary people a special attraction. It is widely acknowledged that there are a lot of actors, athletes and models appearing on the screen to promote the stocks. They convey awareness to the public that they use the production frequently and it works well. A number of citizens would pay for the goods because they pretty trust what the famous person says on the screen and they believe that they would have the same positive consequence as superstars. On the contrary, notable people have a different situation from the public. In addition to the advertised commodities, they may have used more expensive and superior ones. Therefore, how could ordinary people use these products to achieve the same results as renowned people?
Finally, except for excessive decoration, the actual creation effect is diverse from person to person. Someone may discover that the brand could give them lots of active power, but others may complain that the ads transmit them an error message. Hence, instead of credulous advertising, people should choose the most suitable products for their specific circumstances.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, advertising is everywhere now and propagandizes to mass all kinds of well-designed merchandise. The actual function of the production is not as huge as the endorsement so that family members should polish their eyes and make the most beneficial choices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-23 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | Hello GRE | 68 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Hello GRE | 60 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement it s better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject use reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 50
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that several methods of protecting the forests from being infected by the P ramorum mentioned in the reading passage 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, hence, however, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, well, apart from, except for, for example, in addition, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25701943844 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02701614047 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533477321814 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.020597315 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.416666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2916666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.79166666667 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18752724253 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498437981554 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065938202729 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109360629339 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648645287122 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.