Do you agree or disagree with following statement? A new teaching method, professor record a video in advance for students to learn, class time used to answer questions and have discussions. Is it an effective method?
Living in a modern world, it’s impossible for us to have no electronic products. With the appearance of them, especially in the business world, electronic products help us improve our efficiency. Nevertheless, not only is the innovation needed in the business industry, but also the education. Some professors prefer recording a previous video first, while the ordinary class time will be transformed to discuss questions. In my opinion, it maybe not as good as we expected. My following statements will give you the answer.
Firstly, recorded video cannot gurantee that students will have the same efficiency as they do in the ordinary classrooms. That’s because when we are at home, we can study in our most comfortable way. For instance, I can take my experience as an example. In my last summer break, my friends and I decided to take an online course about programming. During that period, we don’t need to dress up formally to meet school’s demands. Instead, we can wear our pyjamas and sit on the soft sofa with delicious snacks in our left hands. By no means, it is hard for us to keep fully concentrated on the lectures. Because of the convenience of the online course, we don’t have the anxious emotion about the due any more. At the end of the course, we still didn’t have a clear framework about programming.
Secondly, it’s not a good way for professors to realize the accurate level of their students are at. When we are in a traditional classroom, instant communication and feedback play an important role in the class. When we are having a physics class and the thesis is truly hard to grasp, it needs professors to repeat it again and again patiently. Meanwhile, experienced professors can adjust their teaching plans smoothly. Besides, it also enables them to realize whether they have express their whole feelings. While, if we only have the videos and discussion on the classroom, whether we have met professors’ demands is hard to be proved. Day by day, some students may have trouble in some natural subjects and they may fail in that.
Admittedly, the recorded videos can be seen for many times. While, when it comes to the study, the proficiency in knowledge is more important than the convenience in learning.
Anyway, recorded video is a good way to help us study, but it shouldn’t be the only way and it cannot replace the traditional lecture. We should use it in a moderate way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them, especially in the business world, electronic products help us improve our ...
^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is more important than the convenience in learning. Anyway, recorded video i...
^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a moderate way" with adverb for "moderate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e traditional lecture. We should use it in a moderate way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94927536232 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93276903549 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519323671498 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7187907555 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.8076923077 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185686313244 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535425335426 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460394590526 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101807361286 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403423716334 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.