Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Success can be define in many forms. It can be define in form of creativeness, wealth, talent and personality as well. It will be inappropriate to judge one's success in monetary terms. Success has nothing to do with the balance sheet of an individual.
The primary reason for my disagreement with the statement is the various measures of success. It is possible that a person has refined taste in arts and he/she makes really melodious music. This art is incomparable to monetary terms. It is possible that this kind of artists demands public utilities for betterment of society rather than demanding huge amount of money for their creativity. For an example, people like Mr. Rajnikanth never ask for money for his acting, he just adopts few villages and tell producers to invest money for improvement of that villages. Yes, they too are successful but their success has nothing to do with their bank balance.
The another example can be the scientist, who gives his/her whole life in inventing some extra-ordinary stuff. He/she is not given huge amount of money for inventing something excellent theory, phenomena, machine or a device. They simply give their contribution in their respective fields for advancement of the nation. For an examples, scientists like Newton, Galileo, Tesla, Graham Bell and Dr APJ Abdul Kalam never earned huge amount of money but their contribution in physics and technology has led to advancement of the lifestyle of the people. They are considered as the most successful scientists of the era.
Apart from art and science, there are few leaders and politicians well-known for their tremendous leadership quality and sparking personality. Abraham Lincoln, former president of the USA was famous for this reason and still considered as one of the best leaders in the world. There are many more examples for this as Mr Narendra Modi, Mr Manohar parikar, Mr Barak Obama and Mr Vladimir Putin.
Conclusively, it is totally diaphanous to define success in terms of money earned. There exists some brilliant scientist, teachers, artists, leaders, politicians, soldiers, engineers and doctors who are successful because of their own talent and knowledge. It will be better to use more generalized perspective to consider the success of an individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | Andrew1507 | 52 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Mrudula | 76 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Toefl2019 | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | udayrade1206 | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | ankitapatel | 3 | view |
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 56
- summarize the points made in the lectures, being sure to explain how they answer specific problem mention in the passage. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 40
- summarize the points made in the lecture, also state how they cast doubt on the information presented in the passage. 60
- Leaders like John F Kennedy and Luther King has high contribution to the people of the united states. Name any one world leader who you think has contributed to the people. Give specific reasons behind your choice. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...well. It will be inappropriate to judge ones success in monetary terms. Success has ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 325, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an example' or simply 'examples'?
Suggestion: an example; examples
...elds for advancement of the nation. For an examples, scientists like Newton, Galileo, Tesla...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'apart from', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.317191283293 0.229887763892 138% => OK
Verbs: 0.118644067797 0.158761421928 75% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0871670702179 0.0866891130778 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0363196125908 0.046263068375 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0484261501211 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128329297821 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0290556900726 0.0351676179071 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86313048527 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0217917675545 0.0309702414327 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0702179176755 0.0887237588012 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0121065375303 0.0209618222197 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00484261501211 0.0139019557991 35% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2287.0 2387.08602151 96% => OK
No of words: 369.0 408.028673835 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19783197832 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48200974243 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.39837398374 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30352303523 0.251872472559 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205962059621 0.174417080927 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151761517615 0.112833075102 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86313048527 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.524397521467 105% => OK
Word variations: 61.8570360975 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5714285714 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0997636503 48.84282405 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.904761905 120.699889404 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.5533526081 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.380952380952 0.644075263715 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.9237320945 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 2.33333333333 1.45489161554 160% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25739950718 0.300154397459 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0987515597221 0.103427244359 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0917933242133 0.0752933317313 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.492211903295 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113879174279 0.151897553556 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917884327749 0.114077575197 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510751801954 0.0781384742642 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.277272864123 0.336927656856 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0871514961545 0.067059652881 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163627099548 0.210909579961 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405268477188 0.0618886996521 65% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 8.42114695341 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.