Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, people have access to information more than never before. Whether it is essential to obtain information from many sources in order to be well-informed, though, it is a matter of intense debate. As far as I am concerned, I concur with that statement. this position is based on two main reasons that will be analyzed more thoroughly below.
Firstly, exist some media outlets that are politically biased, therefore, they do not always offer accurate news. it is common to see journalists who even lie in order to affect the public’s vision of a political event or organization. A compelling example of this, are the uncountable fake news that has arisen about president trump. For example, last night I was reading an article that ensures that, president trump, had used his political influence to impulse his personal affairs. To make a long history short, some details that the author gave to prove his argument were so ridiculous that was quite simple for me to find in the internet facts that contradict his suppose proofs. If I had believed these ideas, and I was not consulted other sources, now I would have a wrong opinion about it.
Secondly, consulting different sources ensures you get more data about an event. Not all the programs have enough time to analyze an event in depth. news has only 2 or 3 minutes to inform each news. Consequently, they only have time to give essential data in this regard. For example, two months ago I read a headline about a flood warning in the news. that worried me a lot, owing to I live in an area that is susceptible to suffer intense floodings. I swiftly took my phone and acquired more information in the weather channel website and realized that my area was not under threat.
In summation, I am of the opinion that the best way to be well-informed is to consult dissimilar sources. this is owing to some media are politically polarized, and other do not have enough time to deliver a detailed report on an incident.
- TOEFL T P O 16 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO20 80
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisement. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing”. The advertisers hire people-buzzers-who personally promote (buzz) product to people they know or meet. The key part i 90
- Existing doubts over the authenticity of a Rembrandt's painting named Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. 76
- Exist quite evidence to affirm that dinosaurs were endotherms 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...oncerned, I concur with that statement. this position is based on two main reasons t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...they do not always offer accurate news. it is common to see journalists who even l...
^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: News
...ough time to analyze an event in depth. news has only 2 or 3 minutes to inform each ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...line about a flood warning in the news. that worried me a lot, owing to I live in an...
^^^^
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ormed is to consult dissimilar sources. this is owing to some media are politically ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79130434783 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73532286546 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4661266568 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1578947368 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174409859562 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051734324086 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533380120242 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107460573003 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564128063345 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.