Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Getting new information help to develop the knowledge about a particular topic and be aware them of the events that happen in the surrounding of the people. Regarding this issue, this is a longstanding debate among the socialist whether people should rely on one source or many different sources. Some hold the view that for being well-informed it is logical to get data from various sources. In contrast, some people take an opposite opinion and just trust one source. From my perspective, the former opinion is more correct. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my points of view cogently.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that there is possible that one source sometimes misleads people by presenting false and wrong news. Hence, it is rational to get information from diverse and valid sources to be confident about the accuracy of news. According to the fact that some sources due to the personal or beneficiary reasons present false. To clarify, the foriegn news occasionally changes the news in their interest to change themselves better than them or they want to pretend their competitors lie.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is that there are variable ideas and news about the specific issue. Thus, if you just get your information from one news source, you never be able to realize that is it completely true or not. Apart from this, there are many sources with limited information, for example, the newspaper could not discuss all the news happened in one week or even one day from around the world. However, the Internet provides different sources about a unique news or it shows a plentiful news that happen just in one hour let alone in one week. I cite my experience to shed light in this context. When I listen to the domestic social media, I realize that they not only tell the truth but also want to change the statistics to show they do they role perfect. It turns out, if I did not read the myriad of resources, I was a stupid girl who justifies and thinks about other people inappropriately.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that by attaining variouse sources, we may be well-informed
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | shrijan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mobinzaarreh | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | bbbbaaakkk | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement?The government is better to pay the budget for building the new projects rather than old buildings. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 50Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus the 3
- TPO 27 integrated writing 81
- TPO 53 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...her people should rely on one source or many different sources. Some hold the view that for be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be never
...r information from one news source, you never be able to realize that is it completely t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 520, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'plentiful news'.
Suggestion: plentiful news
...sources about a unique news or it shows a plentiful news that happen just in one hour let alone ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84656084656 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72701410302 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558201058201 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1407067618 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244266189253 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721549092652 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579881239297 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145582988306 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144337093303 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.