Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, we can see there are totally different news sources. Some believe that in order to be well-informed they should get information from many resources. I agree this idea because of two main reasons.
First, a lot of news agencies broadcast biased news so if someone just follows one news service he may misleads by that. But if information is taken from different resources, the possibility of being deceived is reduced. For instance, when the Ukrainian airplane fall down I believed that something is unusual so I read the CNN in addition to internal news agencies like FARS so I don't mislead by news and at last, it reveals that the plane was crashed by an Iranian missile.
Second, when a person gets news from different news agency, if one of them tells lie he can understand. Imagine that just one news agency tells news about a special political issue but other news agencies don't say anything about that topic. You can easily conclude that the news agency possibly lying about that topic. For example, I remember that after a mortal kind of flue wide spreads in China, Reuters claims that the cure of the disease found by one of the Europeans countries but intentionally abstain from giving that to China. This news omits later and Reuters apologize for the fake news.
To sum up, following many resources has the advantages of first, to not mislead by biased news and second, you can distinguish fake news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o internal news agencies like FARS so I dont mislead by news and at last, it reveals...
^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...political issue but other news agencies dont say anything about that topic. You can ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1977.66487455 60% => OK
No of words: 248.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8064516129 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5052364514 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592741935484 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 618.680645161 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3756871305 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244900285978 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104770414788 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845200213809 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17206902674 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633395369422 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.