Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Some people argue that information from one sources is more than enough to get reliable information because if we follow one renown author or news advocator then one can get logical reasoning, and getting information from different areas makes people more baffled and chaos to support their points. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that person must get information from diverse sources to order to be a intelligent and more aware for following two reasons.
To begin with, using various sources to get copious information will helps us to guaranteeing our information. For instance, when a journalist wants to write a article about the issues on political or finance of country, he/she must be wary while choosing the information. He/she has to check whether the sources are trustworthy. If he/she puts wrong important in the paper, it will be disaster for both journalist and news editor. It is crucial to guaranteeing the information because Sometimes the information that people get from one source is not reliable due to author's mistake. By comparing same information from various sources one can get germane information. Thus, by using diverse information one can get relevant information.
Furthermore, with many different sources people can collect information so rapidly and conveniently. For example, when I needed references about network protocol for my assignment, I could get them from many variable sources, from books, the internet and my professor. With such different sources, I received enough information to finish my assignment. If I only used one of them, I might not have finished it. It is important to collect information so quickly and conveniently because the explosion of the internet with high speed connection and the mobile devices today, people now can get the information about their concerned areas so much more conveniently than before. Therefore, diverse sources help to get collect information speedily and conveniently.
To sum up, the issue of whether a person can well-informed through gathering various sources is complex. Some suggested that for getting information one source is enough if the author logic is revelant. Nevertheless, I still contend that to be well-informed and to keep abreast of something people should gather information from diverse areas and it helps to guaranteeing the information and people can get speedily and conveniently through the various information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h to get reliable information because if we follow one renown author or news advo...
^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ion from diverse sources to order to be a intelligent and more aware for followin...
^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...sources to get copious information will helps us to guaranteeing our information. For...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tance, when a journalist wants to write a article about the issues on political o...
^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'guarantee'?
Suggestion: guarantee
...alist and news editor. It is crucial to guaranteeing the information because Sometimes the i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...evant information. Furthermore, with many different sources people can collect information ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45052083333 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02496013913 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463541666667 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1887956834 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.277777778 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368182281425 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139943913483 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712474838411 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257195274371 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462325129877 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.