Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, monetary issues are among the most important factors of our lives. Living in the today complex society necessitates knowing how to manage monetary matters and adopt ourselves to probable new conditions. There has been much debate among parents whether children should be taught financial issues or not. I would believe that it would be beneficial for children for a couple of reasons.
First, if children learn about how to manage their money, they can subsequently learn to save money for the difficult conditions may occur in the near future. It is very crucial to have savings in every pace of life, and if children are not taught to save money, they may deal with great failures when they become adults. In other words, if this experience learnt early in the youth, it prevents a lot of difficulties in the future life. When one becomes adult, it will be more difficult to learn such issues because there are no longer persons like parents dedicate their time for children. I remember the lessons my father taught me, have been very practical for me yet and it greatly brought about impressive successes in my life.
Second, learning the financial responsibility from the young age can lead to have children capable of planning for their future more effectively. When a child becomes familiar with financial matters, he/she finds a vivid and realistic perspective toward different relevant issues like education and career. As an example, if a student knows that for a specific field of study, it will be difficult to find a job, he/she may be less eager to pursue that field despite of heart enthusiasm with respect to that area. In fact, the monetary matters as a potential problem of future life can be clearly described by teaching financial responsibility to children.
Last but not least, teaching how to manage money is a good practice for children to enter business in near future and children can be prepared for the complicated business matters. In fact, parents can teach their children how to manage money, how to get experience form the past failures, and how to apply them to succeed in the future endeavor. Besides, parents can give the responsibility of the monetary matters of family to children. In that way, students can learn what to buy and what not to buy to have enough money until the end of period. It would be a great practice for being an excellent businessman.
To sum it up, parents have many difficulties to prepare immature children for the complex and tricky world. In this regards, it would be a good suggestion to teach students monetary matter through different ways.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 73
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
... to manage money, how to get experience form the past failures, and how to apply the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...en for the complex and tricky world. In this regards, it would be a good suggestion ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, thus, in fact, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92567567568 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62658870495 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.524837075471 94% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9300352017 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.35 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17203792058 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571337537669 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504778421665 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957536264883 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493390148586 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.