Parents’ role in education has been a debatable issue. Educationists argue that there is more parent involvement in children’s education today than in the past. Personally, I express my approval of this argument.
On one hand, what has been put under consideration is the involvement of parents into their children’s education. It is well noted that is the current world, there are advanced, constantly developing technologies created to aid people with their daily jobs, therefore reducing the amount of time needed for working. Hence, parents are left with ample time to raise and care for their children. They are presented a great opportunity to help their children with their schoolwork, or to teach their children themselves to enhance their knowledge. For that reason, parents now play a more crucial part in their children education. More interestingly, it is common knowledge that nowadays, being educated has much greater importance. For instance, with a college degree, people are more likely to get accepted for a job. Parents are aware of this fact, subsequently they are more interested in their children’s academic progress. As a result, they are certain to take on a larger part in educating their children. Indeed, comparing to the olden days, there are more involvement by parents in kids’ learning process.
On the other hand, some people might say that because of video games and social media, parents are too distracted and no longer care for their loved ones. As a consequence, this prevents parents from taking any part in teaching their children. However, that is not necessarily the case. In fact, because they also have many other work to be done, it is not possible for them to spend too much time on these leisure activities. In addition, the fact is that today, it is much easier and more efficient for parents to educate their kids. With the arrival of innovations, parents are provided with much more powerful and accessible tools for education. For example, the Internet gives people access to an abundant variety of information. Online books are now available, making it simpler for parents to read and be more knowledgeable, thus enabling them to teach their own family. It follows that parents are certain to play a larger role in the education of the children. By and large, the claim that parents’ role in the education of children is reduced in the current world is intrinsically wrong.
In summary, increased free time, greater weight of being educated and aid by innovations are convincing reasons for my approval. It is highly recommended that educationists take my writing into detailed consideration to make a suitable decision on parents’ role in education.
- TPO 4 _ Independent TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- TPO 28 - Integrated Writing Task 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1119, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ement by parents in kids' learning process. On the other hand, some people migh...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20316027088 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98792212288 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489841986456 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6043592837 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.72 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351958476407 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123183834734 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925283301511 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24051246881 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920611251329 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.