Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past.
Education is always a hot topic of the socity, no matter in now or in the past. Some people states that parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents in the past. From my perspective, I consider such statement reasonable.
First, no one can deny that today's children have more experiences in school when compared with children in the past, because they spend more time in schood and are able to participate in a variety of activities. However, their parents usually help them with choosing which school to study in, and it is hard for children to reject. I remembered when I was in high school, my parents already helped me to decide several unversities which I could go after high school. While such thing could hardly happen in the past since parents at that time knew little about the unversities. Therefore, parents today involve more in their children's choices of school then parents in the past.
Besides, in order to make sure their children could receive comprehensive study experience, parents today are more willing to help their children with the enrollment of the study groups, such as some specific tutor courses of instruments and painting. They believe learning these extra technics aside from school can make their children more competitive in the today's society. On the other hand, owing to lack of resources and money, parents in the past seldom let their children enroll in such kinds of study groups. So it is obvious that today's parents spend more energy in their children's education.
Last but not the least, parent today have more methods to invlove in their children's education. For example, they like to use some online applications to check their children's homework, because in this way, they can make more decisive judgments of the homework. While parents in the past did not acquire such technologies, they just could not check their chidren's study only by themselves. So parents today can easily involve in their children's education with the help of the technologies.
In a nutshell, based on my own expericens, I firmly agree with that statement due to parents today devour more energy to help their chidren choose schools, study groups out side from school, and use the technologies to check their children's study conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | haneennazar | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | yqkqknct | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | kameice | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | salarmoheb | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 66
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past that they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future. 73
- The rules that the whole societies today expect to young people to follow and obey are too strict 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
... their children more competitive in the todays society. On the other hand, owing to l...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the todays society. On the other hand, owing to lack of resources and money, pa...
^^
Line 17, column 170, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...ir chidren choose schools, study groups out side from school, and use the technologies t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0498687664 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57941293408 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485564304462 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6898231402 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.176470588 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448996966898 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194427199706 0.076458572812 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129615714987 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303569895285 0.150856017488 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524840823123 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.