Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
If I was in such situation, I would like to choose the second thing to do, which is to wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone. There are a couple of reasons to demonstrate my choice.
First, in my opinion, it is a good way to present politeness. No one can do anything without making mistakes, so it is usual that teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect unintentionally. I just remember that when I was in high school, my math teacher made a slightly wrong formulation of an equation. I thought that problem over for about one minute then made sure that she just made a wrong explanation. But when I confirmed it, she already moved to another chapter, so it was very impolite to disturbe the whole class. I immediately decided to wait until the class was over to talk with her about such little problem. After I talked with her, my teacher felt very happy and confessed that she would make the right explanation on the next class. Therefore, since teacher or the meeting leader do not make such mistakes on purpose, it is reasonable to wait and talk with them later.
Second, if I interrupted and corrected the mistake right away, there would be a disturbance in the peace class or meeting circumstance and teacher or meeting leader might feel upset. To state it more clearly, teacher and meeting leader always want to make the best performance in order to send the useful imformation to others. So when they make some mistakes during the class or meeting, they are not willing to be disturbed. People should treat the class or meeting as a whole and try not to make it interrupted.
Third, it is absolutely wrong to say nothing when you already find there is anything wrong. People need to help others improve, just the same as the teacher and meeting leader do. Moreover, if their mistakes could not be corrected in the future, more others would be misled.
In a nutshell, I definitely will choose to wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader, because it is a good way to present politeness and we should be tolerant to others' mistakes, the peacer class or meeting circumstance will be interrupted if we correct the mistake right away, and saying nothing may not help others improve.
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past that they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure and successful future. 73
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 66
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole and try not to make it interrupted. Third, it is absolutely wrong to say not...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, third, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63503649635 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56702643847 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447688564477 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1256619457 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398162618822 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118243782042 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980240577545 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228968482413 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554834064003 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.