Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past
Nowadays, gaining an education is the utmost part of our life. Without an education, it will be hard to live in this competitive world, and obtaining an education depends mostly on our parents, since they take care of their children more, compared to the past. So, I agree with the statement and I feel this way for the following reasons.
First of all, our parents are aware that obtaining an education is important, so they do everything they can do to ensure the future of their child. My experience is a compelling example of this. Before I was born, my parents married instantly after they graduated from university. So, they did not have an opportunity to further their knowledge, because they had to take care of their children. After I grew up, my parents always told me to prioritize education, since they did not want me to end up just like they did. Even though it is late, my parents are making their best to level up their education l and I feel inspired by them. As a result, I am now fully dedicating my time to further my education level as my parents told me. Secondly, everything is different from the past. At this time, the whole country was in chaos. Parents had no time to take care of their children because there was a war going and not to mention the scarcity of food. Every family needed to work on a full day to pay their high taxes. So, they could not be involved in their children's education. On top of that, there were not many educations institutes to support the child's access to education. Because the young male was demanded to participate in military activity, there was almost no possibility to go to school. Even the female was mobilized to the nursery and hospital. So, the past was wholly different than that of today's society. In conclusion, parents know that their child's education is the most vital part of their life because it is necessary to be a part of this hectic world. Also, everyone has access to the situation regardless of their age, society, nationality, and so on, in contrast to the past. So, it is safe to assume that the past was unlike the contemporary world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-27 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 88 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | dnudlyjgtnudbphwev | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Hello GRE | 73 | view |
- mnmn 3
- About migration hypothesis 70
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 70
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Artificial reefs have several benefits Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1399, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ital. So, the past was wholly different than that of todays society. In conclusion, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56430446194 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57889743264 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50656167979 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2175538366 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0454545455 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3181818182 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293539723185 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802414265061 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056173236282 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213176926108 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031793333876 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1399, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ital. So, the past was wholly different than that of todays society. In conclusion, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56430446194 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57889743264 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50656167979 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2175538366 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0454545455 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3181818182 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293539723185 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802414265061 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056173236282 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213176926108 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031793333876 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.