Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, lives conditions are changed significantly. In this connection, people's diet is not similar to the past. Although contested by many that the matter of people consume healthy food more than before is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that people in the past ate healthier food than today, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, nowadays, people eat their meals at restaurants which do not serve high-quality food. To be more specific, restaurants consider their profits; thus, they do not exploit nourishing food as it is expensive. For example, when I eat food at restaurants, I suffer from digestion problems because they reuse oil for cooking and do not use the materials which contain minerals as well as vitamins. When I cook for myself, I buy all ingredients fresh and try to provide food with high nutrition without extra fat, which maintains my health. However, If restaurants want to use high-quality materials, they will increase the price of food, leading to a reduction in their costumers.
Second, in the past, people used organic production, so they ate healthier food than today. To elucidate, in the past, a person was a farmer and could domesticate animals; hence, they use the products which were obtained naturally. According to my own experience, my grandfather had cows in his yard, and he used the milk and meat of them, so he provided green vegetation for them to grow. On the other hand, people should buy meat from the factory today, which is detrimental to health as they inject animals to force them to produce more milk or eggs. Unfortunately, factories prefer their profits, so they inject animals to make them fat and can earn money by selling them as their weight are high. As a result, they contain a considerable amount of hormones.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that people ate healthy food in the past. Not only do people cook meals at home, but they also eat organic food.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Primary school teachers should not give children aged 5 10 assignments for more than 30 minutes because there are enough instructions to learn in regular school classes 76
- If people want to contribute to society which of the following is the best way Riding bicycle or walking on foot Recycling the waste Buy local organic food 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s better to spend money enjoying life like going on vacation than to save money for the future 76
- At some universities students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria But at some 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t home, but they also eat organic food.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95555555556 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79176478545 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1580483189 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.941176471 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363544796313 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119348721614 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649355749253 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2174459205 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218871425711 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.