Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past people were more friendly than they are today.
No one can deny that many things have been changed during human history. Quality of the relationship between people is one of those changes that should be considered carefully. Although, the level of friendship between people has been a controversial question between sociologists. Personally, were I wanted to analyze people friendship, I would definitely say that people are less friends with each other today. I feel this way because technological advancements force them to work harder, so they cannot see each other enough, and nowadays, people are in the high level of stress and are not patient as much as people in the past. To make my perspective more clear, I will explain these reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first reason that supports my idea is concerned with the fact that technological development keeps people away from each other. While people work too hard today, they see each other lass than people in the past because in the past people live really close together. However, social media provides a lot of ways that people can communicate with each other, but this type of interaction does not help them to befriends with each other. Since being a friend needs active communication. I have a personal experience that shows this idea. When I was in university, I used to talk with my friends through the Internet. Most of the time I was at work, so my only way to see my friends was my smartphone. After a while, our relationship was interrupted and we were less friendly with each other. Had I seen my friend face to face, I would not have lost him.
Another idea that I think should be bought up here is the fact that people are much less patient midways. As a matter of fact, while there are a lot of ways that people use to relax after a hard day, they are not really patient and get angry very easily. Therefore, they are not really interestedin spending their time with others. This lack of patient makes people less friendly with each other because they get angry and upsetabout their friends' reactions and may break their bounds very easily. Nevertheless, in the past people work on farms mostly and this job was not a stress maker as much as today's carriers... To be specified, comprehensive research has shown that due to the high level of today's lifestyle, people are very capricious, consequently, they are not patient. They easily get upset about other's behavior and may fight with them in a few conditions. Therefore they become less friendly with each other. As a result of this study, the more stress people have, the angrier they are, and the less friend they are together.
To make a long story short, I am of the opinion that people were more friendly with each other in the past. This is my firm belief that is rooted in two main reasons: (1) technological advancement forces people to work harder and therefore they do not see each other anymore, and (2) respect to old people was much important in the past and people try to be more friendly with each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-15 | pumayasa | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Hellen Yuan | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | Hellen Yuan | 71 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | H.Meng | 76 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | H.Meng | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past people were more friendly than they are today 73
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home Which do you prefer Why 76
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child 5 10 years old 1 Being helpful 2 Being honest 3 Being well organized 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If you do not make sure other people especially influential people or your employers know about your strengths and accomplishments you will never get successful in life 73
- Summarize the information in reading and the lecture 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es that should be considered carefully. Although, the level of friendship between people...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...stion between sociologists. Personally, were I wanted to analyze people friendship, ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun friends is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... I would definitely say that people are less friends with each other today. I feel t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 439, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...help them to befriends with each other. Since being a friend needs active communicati...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 170, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ile there are a lot of ways that people use to relax after a hard day, they are not...
^^^
Line 6, column 870, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ay fight with them in a few conditions. Therefore they become less friendly with each oth...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, while, as to, i feel, i think, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58677456749 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8119608772 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324427169156 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104642905977 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733347969432 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235596197726 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326570190064 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.