Definitely the world in the past was really different than how it is in these recent days. Everything has been changed, social life, finance, industrialization and so on. Even on the scale of a small family, a lot of changes can be seen. Kids nowadays are more responsible for their decisions than kids in the past, this is because of the advanced technology and the busy life of the parents.
First, nowadays the whole world is under our fingertips, just by a click on a screen we can know so much information. Children don't have to go to the library and set for hours looking for information any more like kids in the past used to do. This approach makes it easy for kids to know more and to be more aware of what happens in the whole world. Not only that, it helps them exchange experiences and knowledge with kids in different countries. With this wide exposure to everything, kids become more capable of taking their own decision without going back to check with their parents. They can search for the advantage and disadvantages of their ideas and decisions. They can ask people who have experience in the thing they need to make a decision about just by chatting with them. In the end, kids now can form an almost complete picture of what they are looking for. Thanks for the advanced technology which made this so easy to happen.
Second, we live in a fast pace life, parents are running in every direction trying to provide the best for their kids, but this makes them usually busy. It ends up; they don't have enough time to spend with their kids. The exact opposite was happening in the past; life pace with much slower, parents had more time to spend some quality time with their kids, which allowed the whole family to discuss a lot of their life issues and decisions at those times. I feel bad for nowadays kids that they have to make their own decisions because it is not easy to have that quality time to spend with their parents. Also, I feel bad for parents because although they run in every direction to learn more and to help their kids, still kids know more about their own world. I experience this with my seven years old son who knows a lot more than me in how to tackle a computer and how to think about solutions to certain problems. What he learns as a second-grade student in science, for example, I -his mother- had learned the same exact thing in my sixth-grade. Kids now have wide knowledge not only in science and math but even socially, which helps them make the right decisions without checking with adults.
In conclusion, I encourage parents to try to assign more time to their kids and to try to discuss those decisions with the kids. This will benefit both the kids and the parents. Kids will make sure to make the right decision; the parent will widen their thinking technique by talking to their kids.
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 68
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 60
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 71
- TPO 41- task 1 60
- Some people think that success in life comes from taking risks or chances. Others think that success results from careful planning. In your opinion, what does success come from? use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... world in the past was really different than how it is in these recent days. Everyth...
^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... can know so much information. Children dont have to go to the library and set for h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...kes them usually busy. It ends up; they dont have enough time to spend with their ki...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, second, so, still, even so, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51937984496 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34396801312 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443798449612 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1027675467 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269158822768 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084495290461 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652372565882 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172882254923 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590951262229 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... world in the past was really different than how it is in these recent days. Everyth...
^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... can know so much information. Children dont have to go to the library and set for h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...kes them usually busy. It ends up; they dont have enough time to spend with their ki...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, second, so, still, even so, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 52.1666666667 163% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51937984496 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34396801312 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443798449612 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1027675467 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269158822768 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084495290461 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652372565882 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172882254923 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590951262229 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.