Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The more the rich life quality people have, the more opportunities to travel around their own countries or other countries people have. In this case, it is a debate that whether people can benefit more from to travel around their own countries than people travel to other countries in the world. However, from my perspective, it is a fact that people can benefit more from to travel foreign counties in the world.

To begin with, it is traveling to foreign countries that can help humans to solidify their second language. Most of country’s second language usually is English, especially in Eastern Asia counties. Therefore, they can by traveling to around the world strength their English ability. For example, our school established an English speaking club in the last year, in this group so desired to speak English highly well is everyone that they planed traveling to the north American. In this travel, every got enough opportunities to speak with the foreigners, thus, everyone English ability increase within the different range. However, traveling in their own countries, they might not have so many opportunities to strength their speaking, unless they could meet some foreigners who came from the English counties and communicated with them. From this example, it is obvious that traveling to others counties can help people to improve their second language.

Additionally, only when some countries’ people travel to other counties can they know more and more different types of culture. As far as I know that some countries in the world are not the immigrant counties and their territories are extremely small. Therefore, hardly can they learn more different cultures if they do not choose to travel to other counties. As North Korea as an example, North Korea which does not have too many different type of cultures does not look like China that has countless different cultures. However, North Korea also is not an immigrant country and a popular traveled country. Therefore, no many foreigners can bring their cultures to North Korea, thus, they just can know other countries’ cultures by traveling to other countries. From this example, it is apparent that traveling to other countries can benefit more for the people who come from countries which are small and do not have too many different cultures.

In conclusion, traveling to other countries not only help one person to improve their second language, but also they can know many cultures which they might have opportunities to know in their own counties.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-09 Simin_MB 73 view
2023-05-04 sonyeoso 83 view
2022-12-23 YAGUT 80 view
2022-12-23 YAGUT 76 view
2022-08-17 himanshu186 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user 地狱博士后 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...le, North Korea which does not have too many different type of cultures does not look like Chi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... a popular traveled country. Therefore, no many foreigners can bring their culture...
^^
Line 5, column 924, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ies which are small and do not have too many different cultures. In conclusion, traveling t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14251207729 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63094932041 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.393719806763 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.397037239 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.277777778 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347503822931 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156283216695 0.076458572812 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106027640445 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256234750161 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119421799007 0.0645574589148 185% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.