Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.
In this progressive and sophisticated world, people have common debates that traveling in their own country is more beneficial than traveling to a foreign country. I think traveling to another country is more beneficial. I will illustrate my two main reasons in the following.
The first and foremost reason is that we have a great opportunity to meet new people and a new lifestyle. It gives us a new sight and helps us to have a flexible reaction in hardship condition. Actually, traveling to another country helps us be open-minded and modern because it is an easy and enjoyable way to refresh our thoughts. Also, it is the easiest way to judge our idea and thoughts in life. If we do not recognize other thoughts and beliefs, we will not know that our thoughts are right or not? And visiting a new place with new interesting something helps refine our minds full of tiredness. For example, I went abroad and learned new points about essential life's aspects, such as the right women and justice because I grew up in a traditional family and a country with old laws. I did not like my wife has a job and go out to work. I could not consider her right to be independent, but I knew that I do not have more rights than women who work the same as me or limit my wife's life.
Secondly, Traveling to other countries is an exciting way to have valuable experiences that help us pass obstacles in our lives' way. We know how to solve a problem in a new position, and it helps us be more creative because being in a new country with a new language and new people that we might not have known before is challenging. All in all, this situation increases our creativity and helps us to find new skills that we have not known with them before or think they are not useful. For instance, last year, my friend and I went to Italy. We booked a cottage in a beautiful and small-town beside a lake. We arrived there at night and could not exactly find the location's cottage because the mobile was out of services and nobody no other language except Italian, but we faced a man who could speak Spanish, and I knew a little Spanish, and he guides us.
In sum, Traveling to foreign countries is a curative task that can refresh our moods and shows us our skills that we do not consider them and help us in emergency situations. The greatest benefit is that we achieve many unique experiences that are very valuable and helpful in our lives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 70
- Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locations'' or 'location's'?
Suggestion: locations'; location's
...at night and could not exactly find the locations cottage because the mobile was out of s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45842696629 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57970676807 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476404494382 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8009808306 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183792268987 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653150816578 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09263364656 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162822195345 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114142876394 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.