do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people in today's world have become too dependent on automobiles
In recent years automobiles become more affordable for most of the people in society. I personally, though, do not believe that people are too dependent on automobiles. So, I am disagreed with the above statement. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, use the automobile is not efficient due to the high price of the foul such as gas or gasoline. That's why people prefer to travel via public transportation system which is less expensive. On the other hand, automobiles demanded a high level of care which is both time consuming and expensive. My own experience demonstrates convincing evidence of this. Last year I found that I was spending a lot of money per month for travelling to work. I decided to do an experiment and try subway instead and I wrote down my expenses for a month. At the end I realize my expenses fell down in an unbelievable amount. Then I kept using the subway instead of my car which was more affordable.
Secondly, Nowadays, public transportation are far better than personal cars as they cover a vast network and they are faster than automobiles. So for people who live in crowd cities is more reasonable to use the public transportation which is faster in comparison to their cars. In addition, in big cities the number of automobile users are too much while the streets system barely can handle this amount. So people have a lot of difficulties to even park their car across the street. For example, last week I had a very important meeting in a shipping center which is located in the center part of my city. It was about 5 kilometers far from my house and I assumed If I derive I will arrive sooner. Such a big mistake because I forgot It was weekend and it is crazy down there. So I stuck in traffic for 2 hours and unfortunately I missed the meeting. If I had used the subway I would have arrived more quickly and I would not have missed the meeting.
As a result, I strongly believe that today people are not too dependent on automobiles due to a vast network of public transportation which is more affordable and swift in comparison with automobiles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Blackcytrus | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | ChiuYuan | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-26 | mina.gt | 90 | view |
| 2021-02-06 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | zahrash75588 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 88
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement people in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles 70
- TPO11 80
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement people in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ce of the foul such as gas or gasoline. Thats why people prefer to travel via public ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'streets'' or 'street's'?
Suggestion: streets'; street's
...automobile users are too much while the streets system barely can handle this amount. S...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, i feel, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58961038961 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81976255865 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7866884901 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3181818182 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202161936191 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579082000798 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714617321405 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163725593473 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101956176346 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.